Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1-- Summoning of witnesses - Provisions of O.16.R.1 CPC are not mandatory but only directory, as the procedural laws are meant for advancement of justice and not to subvert the same...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1(3)-- Affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief of a witness not named in the list of witnesses tendered - Evidence of said witness not to be read in evidence, as leave to examine said witness not given - However, liberty is granted to plaintiff to file an appropriate application to seek leave of Court..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 16, Rule 1-- Dismissal of application U.O.16.R.1 CPC - Revision thereagainst does not lie as such order does not qualify to be order which finally decides lis between parties...........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1-- Examination of witness - Not mentioned in the list of witnesses - Evidence of defendants not yet closed - During continuation of defendants evidence, application U.O.16.R.1 CPC filed by defendant for examining a witness who is none other than identifier in concerned sale deed, which is the subject..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1(1)(2)(3)-- Summons to witnesses - Plaintiff has not supplied the list of witnesses in application nor he gave any reason pointing out necessity of examining said witness - Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of O.16.Rr.1(1)(2)(3) CPC - Application rightly rejected...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 15, 18, 20-- Closure of plaintiff's evidence - Non-appearance of plaintiff for cross-examination - Validity - Only 11 opportunities have been granted to plaintiffs and they are not responsible for couple of adjournments out of it - Plaintiff No.1 had gone to call his counsel but without informing Court -..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1-- Summoning of witness - Application filed by petitioner for summoning Stamp Vendor as witness rejected by trial Court relying upon O.16.R.1 CPC which does not appear in the Bombay Amendment - Held, in so far as the Bombay Amendment is concerned, it permits the parties at any time after suit is..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 14-- Court witness - An application to summon a person as Court witness does not lie - Court exercises power U.O.16.R.14 CPC on its own accord, and not on the insistence by a party to the suit - Though a party to the suit can place any information, which may impress upon or convince Court to exercise..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1, 1-A-- Examination-in-chief of a witness on affidavit - Provision of O.18.R.4(1) CPC applies only when a party examines a witness without issuance of summons as contemplated U.O.16.R.1-A and not of a witness who is summoned U.O.16.R.1 CPC...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1-- List of witnesses - Failure of party to file list of witnesses within 15 days of settlement of issues - Such party can make an application under sub-rule (3) of Rule 1 for permission of the Court to summon any witness and examine him in support of his case...........

Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results