Showing : 1-10 of 20 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Theft - Adverse inference - Allegation that accused stole the bond paper on which settlement among three parties including accused was recorded - It is not believable that accused after snatching bond will again come back on the same day and no action is taken against accused - Adverse inference..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 2(1)(g), 24A-- Insurance - Theft of vehicle - Delay of 8 days in informing Insurance Company - Rejection of claim has to be based on valid grounds - Rejection of claims on purely technical grounds in a mechanical manner will result in loss of confidence of policy-holders in the insurance industry - If reason for..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(g)-- Gang rape of minor girl - Plea of enmity between parties - Mere filing of theft case cannot be termed as enmity between parties and no father will file false case at risk of his minor daughter as in Indian society, rape upon woman is always regarded as stigma - Hence, plea of accused about enmity..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(2)(g), 506, 120B, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6-- Gang rape - Allegation against accused `S' wife of accused `D' that she used to call prosecutrix in her house and when her husband committed rape on prosecutrix she not only bolted door of room but also guarded the same - Version of prosecutrix on face of it appears to be highly improbable, as no..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Injunction - Restraining from disconnecting/shifting/transferring the electric tubewell connection - Tubewell connection installed in the land of plaintiff - However, electric connection in the name of defendant, who is an ex serviceman - Connection allotted to defendant under a special category..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 126,135-- Theft of electricity - Provisional assessment - Held, a demand made and assessment rendered on the basis that there was theft of electricity does not make it an order passed u/s 135 of the Act - Use of electricity through a tampered meter which would constitute theft of electricity is still an..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of vehicle - Damages - Depreciation - Policy document itself has specified that deduction for depreciation @ 5% will have to be made in respect of motor cars between the age of 6 months and 1 year - Plea of the petitioner - complainant that since the vehicle was stolen within a period of 12..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of vehicle - Damages - Depreciation - Policy document itself has specified that deduction for depreciation @ 5% will have to be made in respect of motor cars between the age of 6 months and 1 year - Plea of the petitioner - complainant that since the vehicle was stolen within a period of 12..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Electricity Supply Code, 2007 - Electricity theft - Raising of demand - It is alleged by respondent in his complaint that appellant No. 2 made a demand of Rs. 15,000/ - as bribe from him when he refused to oblige he gave threats to him that he will put a heavy penalty of theft upon him - Rs...........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Electricity Supply Code, 2007 - Electricity theft - Raising of demand - It is alleged by respondent in his complaint that appellant No. 2 made a demand of Rs. 15,000/ - as bribe from him when he refused to oblige he gave threats to him that he will put a heavy penalty of theft upon him - Rs...........

Showing : 1-10 of 20 Results