Showing : 61-70 of 248 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401-- Murder - Acquittal - Validity - Not only all prosecution witnesses supported prosecution's case in its entirety but during cross-examination also they did not made any embellishment or material development - Trial Court rejected evidence of witnesses merely on ground that they are inter-related -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal trial -- Acquittal due to lapses in investigation or negligence - The concerned investigating/prosecuting official(s) responsible for such acquittal must necessarily be identified - A finding needs to be recorded in each case, whether lapse was innocent or blameworthy - Home Department of every State..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal trial -- Acquittal due to lapses in investigation or negligence - The concerned investigating/prosecuting official(s) responsible for such acquittal must necessarily be identified - A finding needs to be recorded in each case, whether lapse was innocent or blameworthy - Home Department of every State..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Service -- Departmental proceedings - Criminal case and departmental proceedings - Acquittal in criminal case, if not honourable, will not have any effect on punishment in departmental proceedings on same/identical charges...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Police Regulations of Calcutta, 1968, Chapter 19, Regl.4 -- Departmental enquiry - Dismissal from service - Acquittal in criminal case - Effect - Held, there is no rule of automatic re-instatement on acquittal by a Criminal Court even though charges levelled against delinquent before Enquiry Officer as well as Criminal Court are same...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), S.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, no limitation of time has been provided by Legislature for exercise of such right of appeal by `victim' in terms of said proviso - Hence, in the fact and circumstances of each case,..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, proviso to S.372 Cr.P.C. came into operation w.e.f. December 31, 2009 - Hence, in absence of any legislative intent to contrary, in all cases, in which a judgment and order has been passed by a..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, if subject of crime is dead or incapacitated to extent or suffers from such a disability that he/she cannot take steps to exercise his/her right under proviso to S.372, any of his/her..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, no distinction can be made between a case instituted by complainant/informant with police and by complainant before Court directly - An absolute right of victim (complainant or not) to file an appeal..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397, 401-- Revision against acquittal - Re-appreciation of evidence is not possible in a revision against acquittal unless and until there are some procedural irregularities or illegalities in the decision of case - Even if reading of evidence by trial court is free from flaw the same cannot be ground to..........

Showing : 61-70 of 248 Results