Showing : 61-70 of 252 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256(1), 255(1)-- Non appearance of complainant - Acquittal of accused - After accused pleaded not guilty, acquittal of accused can be only u/s 255(1) or 256(1) Cr.P.C. as the case may be, and there is no other provision in between, to order acquittal of an accused on the ground of absence of complainant or..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 44, 39-- Pilferage of electrical energy - Assessment - Mere acquittal of petitioner in criminal case for his alleged act of pilferage of electrical energy on the ground of no, production of cogent evidence does not confer any right in petitioner to claim innocence in matter of illegal drawing of energy -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 148, 149, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- Murder - Prosecution witnesses made important and material improvements in the original case of prosecution - Evidence of witnesses shows that only one shot was fired on the deceased - Post mortem report shows 16 gun shot injuries on the deceased - Injuries sustained by other persons not mentioned..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401-- Murder - Acquittal - Validity - Not only all prosecution witnesses supported prosecution's case in its entirety but during cross-examination also they did not made any embellishment or material development - Trial Court rejected evidence of witnesses merely on ground that they are inter-related -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal trial -- Acquittal due to lapses in investigation or negligence - The concerned investigating/prosecuting official(s) responsible for such acquittal must necessarily be identified - A finding needs to be recorded in each case, whether lapse was innocent or blameworthy - Home Department of every State..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal trial -- Acquittal due to lapses in investigation or negligence - The concerned investigating/prosecuting official(s) responsible for such acquittal must necessarily be identified - A finding needs to be recorded in each case, whether lapse was innocent or blameworthy - Home Department of every State..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Service -- Departmental proceedings - Criminal case and departmental proceedings - Acquittal in criminal case, if not honourable, will not have any effect on punishment in departmental proceedings on same/identical charges...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Police Regulations of Calcutta, 1968, Chapter 19, Regl.4 -- Departmental enquiry - Dismissal from service - Acquittal in criminal case - Effect - Held, there is no rule of automatic re-instatement on acquittal by a Criminal Court even though charges levelled against delinquent before Enquiry Officer as well as Criminal Court are same...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), S.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, no limitation of time has been provided by Legislature for exercise of such right of appeal by `victim' in terms of said proviso - Hence, in the fact and circumstances of each case,..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, proviso to S.372 Cr.P.C. came into operation w.e.f. December 31, 2009 - Hence, in absence of any legislative intent to contrary, in all cases, in which a judgment and order has been passed by a..........

Showing : 61-70 of 252 Results