Showing : 2721-2730 of 5166 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2)-- Sample of groundnut oil found adulterated - Accused convicted - Report of public analyst not sent to the accused u/s 13(2) of the Act - Held, it deprives the accused of an important safeguard and defense - Accused, in the absence of report cannot move the court for sending other part of the sample..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2)-- Protracted trial - Conviction - Accused suffered 25 years of protracted trial - Also suffered sentence of near about 5 days - Plea that sentence of one year be reduced to already undergone - Cannot be allowed - High Court has no power to reduce imprisonment less than the minimum period prescribed..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13-- Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 19 - Procedure - Affidavit evidence - Discarded by the State Commission on a mere technical ground that the said affidavit was not in conformity with the provisions of Order 19 CPC - Held that the provisions of CPC could not be strictly applied to the proceedings..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Landlord sought eviction of demised premises to run business - Plea of tenant that landlord has already second and third floor of the building in his possession - Held, contention of tenant not tenable - It is for landlord to decide as to how he will like to use the tenanted..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Plea of tenant that eviction sought not for bonafide necessity but for seeking enhancement of rent - Contention not sustainable - Tenant himself admitted that landlord never sought enhancement when the tenanted premises fell to his share in a family settlement...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bonafide requirement - Relationship of landlord and tenant - Ejectment sought on the ground of personal necessity - Landlord got rented premises in family settlement - Tenant cannot challenge family settlement...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(i)-- Eviction petition - Sub tenant - Not a necessary party to an ejectment proceedings...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction order - Execution - Objection by third party claiming himself to be a direct tenant - Held, there in no compulsion on the part of the Executing Court to proceed in the matter only after framing of issues...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction of tenant on ground of bona fide requirement - Tenant taking plea that landlord had sold three shops in recent past - Evidence does not establish exclusive ownership of landlord of sold shops - Need bona fide...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Eviction of tenant on ground of bona fide requirement - Landlord required premises for his son who has done masters in Chemical Engineering to run projected business - Tenant contended that landlord has another alternative site - Contention not tenable - Held, tenant cannot dictate to landlord..........

Showing : 2721-2730 of 5166 Results