Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118(a)-- Pronote - Presumption - Suit for recovery - In the instant case, plaintiff is involved in money lending business without obtaining any licence under Money Lender`s Act and defendant admits his signature on pronote and receipt but with a rider that signatures were obtained on blank paper in..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Funds insufficient - Friendly loan - Accused admitted his signatures on cheque as well as on two pronotes and the fact that he borrowed loan from complainant - Once pronote has been signed and executed by accused, it acts as an acknowledgement of transaction - Presumption..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Funds insufficient - Friendly loan - Accused admitted his signatures on cheque as well as on two pronotes and the fact that he borrowed loan from complainant - Once pronote has been signed and executed by accused, it acts as an acknowledgement of transaction - Presumption..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 20, 118-- Recovery suit based on pronote - Defendant admitted signatures on the documents - The defendant pleaded that he put signatures on blank forms which were filled later - Held, burden is on defendant to prove his plea - Bank is not required to prove that defendant put signatures on filled up forms...........

Showing : 1-4 of 4 Results