LawMirror.com

Results of adulteration of food

Showing : 61-70 of 460 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Section 7, 13(1)(d) - - Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Held, what has to be proved is not mere recovery of money but also that demand was made and money paid pursuant to that demand...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- Report of Central Food Laboratory - It is substitution with the report of Public Analyst - If the report of CFL discloses no offence whatsoever, then, it is a case for cessation of the prosecution proceedings - However, when report of CFL is different with that of Public Analyst then accused cannot contend that..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- Offence of misbranding - Right of accused to get his sample analyzed - Held, even in a case where offence of misbranding alone is disclosed on analysis of sample food item by public analyst and that has led to prosecution of offender thereof, he is still having statutory right to invoke S.13(2) of the PFA Act for..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2), 19 - - Private complaint - Sanction for prosecution as required u/s 19 of Act is a condition precedent to entertain private complaint alleging offences under P.C. Act - Special Judge referred complaint to police without considering whether private complaint against member of Legislative Assembly which is..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Storage or distribution of an adulterated article of food for a purpose other than for sale does not fall within the mischief of Ss.7 & 16 of the Act - Merely for the reason that sample was given without stating that it was not for sale or that its price was accepted does not ipso facto amount to sale unless it is..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Curd - While collecting sample of curd it has to be cut vertically then churned if the curd has not settled - There is a marked difference between stirring and churning - While article can be said to have been stirred if it is rotated by means of spoon and churning would mean that it is vigorously blended so that..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 20, 20A, 17, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 305, 319 -- Offence by company - Sample of `Fruit Yogurt' was found to be not conforming to standard of `Fruit Yogurt' - Prosecution of directors - Held, provision of S.20A could be used only to summon manufacturer, distributor or dealer - Cognizance could not be taken..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 17 -- Company - Director vicariously liable only if he was in charge of affairs of company at the time offence was committed - A director cannot be deemed to be in charge of the affairs of a company simply because of his being a director unless so pleaded in the complaint - No such pleading in the complaint -..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- An accused who never applied u/s 13(2) of the Act, cannot contend that his right u/s 13(2) of the Act is defeated since the complaint is launched much after the "best before date" of the product, and therefore the proceeding is bad...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(ii), 7(i)(v), 2(ia)(b) -- `Talc' found in the food item - Held, when `talc' allegedly detected in the sample of food item is a prohibited item, nothing more need be stated in the analysis report other than that the food item is adulterated...........

Showing : 61-70 of 460 Results