Showing : 1-10 of 24 Results

TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert opinion - Age of ink - There is an organization called Nutron Activation Analysis, BARC, Mumbai, which is a Central Government Organization, which undertakes the task of determining the age of ink/writing of a document...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert opinion - Age of ink - Document alleged to be signed in 2008 and not in 2012 - Courts must take of note of the aspect while appreciating rival contentions that mere determination of age of ink/writing by an expert will not clinch the issue as to when exactly the maker has written/signed the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145-- Dishonour of cheque - Determination of age of ink - No scientific accurate test is available for determination of age of ink - Petition dismissed...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Determination of age of cheque and ink on the cheque - No pleadings or submission in this regard while replying to the notice or making submissions before Court - Moreover, signatures admitted by petitioner and other parameters appearing to be in conformity with provisions of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, 67-- Expert opinion - Determination of age of ink - Difference in the ink of signatures and other writings of cheques in question admitted by plaintiff - No requirement for sending cheques for examination by expert for the purpose of determining age of ink - Application rightly rejected...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Age of ink - Not possible for an expert to give any definite opinion on the age of ink as there is no accurate scientific method to determine the age of ink...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Disputed signatures - Determination of age of ink - Application for expert opinion filed at belated stage - Accused never came up with any specific defence until his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded - More so, accused has already been given sufficient..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Signatures - Dispute as to - Determination of age of signatures and writing on cheque - Court has to afford an opportunity to accused to obtain an expert's opinion as to genuineness or otherwise of all the signatures found therein - However, said ratio will not apply to a..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Dishonour of cheque - Ascertainment of age of ink in signature, other contents in the cheque and number of pens used for filling in it by an expert of Forensic Science - Application filed belatedly after taking nearly fifteen adjournments - Held, request was meant only to procastinate the pending..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Age of ink - Determination - Scientific expert and equipment to determine age of ink not available in India - Disputed document cannot be sent to scientific expert - If, in future such expert emerges and equipment is made available then Court may send disputed documents to him for opinion...........

Showing : 1-10 of 24 Results