Showing : 441-450 of 701 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 37-- Execution - Arrest and detention of J.D. - D.H. is required to place some material before the Executing Court which indicates that J.D. is possessed of property and means - D.H. is not required to conclusively prove as regards the means of J.D...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Body of victim found much before arrest of accused which was known to entire village - Information given by accused u/s 27 of Evidence Act not admissible in evidence regarding his admission of committing the offence...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(xi)-- Prevention of atrocities - Anticipatory bail - In view of allegations made in the FIR as also statement of witnesses recorded during investigation it cannot be said that ingredients of offence under the Act of 1989 are absent - Held, application of applicant is dismissed as not maintainable in..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438-- Anticipatory bail - If threat of arrest is due to reasons other than what is sated in S.438 Cr.P.C. like non appearance in Court even after receipt of summons or directions by Court or default appearance in Court, S.438 Cr.P.C. has no application...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20, 36A(4), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2)-- Charas - Recovery of 11-1/2 kg. - Challan not presented within 180 days - No application for extension filed - Accused is entitled to bail u/s 167(2) Cr.P.C. - In the instant case bail not granted as recovery was heavy and charge-sheet filed on 196th day of arrest - Once charge sheet is filed..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Asking police for arrest and then telling complainant that he had not done a good thing to him and he had deceived him - Held, it is not a statement of innocence and on the contrary it was a statement showing anguish that the complainant had got him caught...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 37, 38, 39, 40-- Execution - Arrest warrant - For issuance of arrest warrant Court has to adopt the procedure prescribed U.O.21.Rr.37 to 40 CPC - There must be material to prove that J.D. is avoiding the payment despite the fact that he has sufficient means to pay and then Court has to pass appropriate order..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 9-- Restitution of conjugal rights - No serious dispute between the parties when wife left the house of husband - Husband and his family members subjected to criminal prosecution and their arrest - Wife threatened the husband to ruin his family - Held, Court wrongly decreed the petition for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, Section 3, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 68C-- Proviso - Property - Forfeiture - Money earned from drug trafficking invested in property - Central Govt. has power to forfeit the same whether purchased by the person in his own name or in the name of his near relatives - Provision of S.68-C is constitutionally valid - Such property cannot be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, Section 3, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 68C-- Property - Forfeiture - Money earned from drug trafficking invested in property - Central Govt. has power to forfeit the same whether purchased by the person in his own name or in the name of his near relatives - Provision of S.68-C is constitutionally valid - Such property cannot be forfeited if..........

Showing : 441-450 of 701 Results