Showing : 91-100 of 174 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15, 21, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Recovery of 50 kg. of poppy husk - Accused in custody for last four months - Challan not presented yet - Contraband recovered does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity - Bail granted...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 37-- Non filing of charge sheet within sixty days - Accused enlarged on bail - Reason given by prosecution for delay is that quantitative analysis of material seized from accused to determine whether quantity involved was small quantity or commercial quantity could not be done on account of failure of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8(c), 22, 23, 25, 27A, 53, 53A, 58-- Export of drugs mentioned in Schedule `G' and `H' of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules without a export license - Application for bail rejected by trial Court and High Court - Drugs and Cosmetics Act does not deal with exports - Provisions of Customs Act do - Licensees were thus required to comply..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 21, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Offence u/ss 8, 21 NDPS Act - Recovery of 300 gm. of smack - FSL report of 31.25% of heroin i.e. actual weight of heroin coming to 93.75 gm. which is below commercial quantity - No criminal history of accused - Accused in jail for more than one year - Bail granted...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 27A, 29, 37-- Contraband - Recovery of 4.9 kgs. of heroin - Bail - Reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner is not guilty of offence under the Act - Second limb of S.37(b) of the Act that Court must be satisfied that petitioner is not likely to commit offence under Act if released on bail - Satisfied in..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 21, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Offence u/ss 8, 21 NDPS Act - Bail - Sought on ground that accused is falsely implicated in the case and there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery and there are no criminal antecedents of the accused - Bail granted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Protracted trial for seven years - Appellants in their youth - Appellants did not commit any offence before registration of the present case or after grant of bail - Appellants not involved in the trade of narcotic substance - Quantity recovered non commercial - Sentence reduced to one year -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37-- Bail - Offence under NDPS Act - In additional to the principles applicable for grant of bail in an offence under IPC the relevant provision in the special statute in this regard has to be kept in view...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37-- Bail - Offence under NDPS Act - Satisfaction contemplated regarding accused being not guilty, has to be based on 'reasonable grounds' - It means something more than prima facie grounds - It connotes substantial probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offence he is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37-- Bail - Offence under NDPS Act - Court granted bail on the ground (i) that nothing has been found from the possession of the accused; (ii) accused is in jail for the last three years and (iii) there is no chance of his appeal being heard within a period of seven years - Bail granted on such grounds..........

Showing : 91-100 of 174 Results