Showing : 21-30 of 33 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Hindu Law-- Alienation - Child gets an interest in property by birth as co-parcenary/ancestral property and has the right to challenge the alienation made by father if it is against the norms of Hindu Law i.e. without legal necessity, not for the benefit of the estate and as an act of mis-management...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Sale of minor's share in Joint Hindu Family Property - Father has special powers of such alienation including son's share for legal necessity or for the benefit of the estate or for the discharge of antecedent debts not tainted by illegality or immorality...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - If sale is for legal necessity or benefit of the estate or for meeting the antecedent debts then Karta cannot be restrained from alienating the coparcenary property...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - It is not the rule of law that Karta is required to consult other members of the family and obtain their consent for the purpose of alienating the Joint Family Property - The requirement of law is that if alienation of joint family property is made by..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Agreement to sell-- Co-sharer - When one of the co-sharers enters into an agreement to sell entire estate belonging to the entire body of the proprietors, it does not bind the others - The vendor is entitled to specific performance qua the share of the person entered into agreement with him - The vendee in that case..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Hindu Law - Joint Family Property - Alienation by manager - Manager entitled to make alienation for family necessity or for benefit of estate - Sale by manager is voidable and not void - Alienee entitled to possession unless sale is avoided by appropriate action by other coparcener - Remedy of..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 101-- Sale of minors property - Whether for legal necessity or for benefit of estate - Burden of proof is on the alienee...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Hindu Law-- Joint Family Property - Alienation - Some of the coparceners minor - Held, when an alienation is made by the Karta of a Joint Hindu Family for a legal necessity or for the benefit of the estate, the consent of minor coparcener is not required...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, Section 1A2-- Scope - Cause of action under both the provisions is different - Under S.1 damages are recoverable for the benefit of the persons mentioned therein and under S.2 compensation goes to the benefit of the estate - Under S.1 damages are payable in respect of loss sustained by the persons mentioned..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1988
Details
Hindu Law-- Co-parcenary property - Karta can alienate for legal necessity or for the benefit of the estate - A co-parcener has no right of restraint against Karta from discharging his duties as Karta, in accordance with law. (Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.39, Rr.1, 2)..........

Showing : 21-30 of 33 Results