Showing : 31-40 of 58 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Trap laid and recovery effected - Plea of false implication as defacto complainant had quarreled some days earlier - Held, in view of specific and consistent evidence about demand and payment of bribe unfolded by the prosecution witnesses, the plea put forth by the accused..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - In corruption case, the prosecution must prove both the demand and acceptance of the bribe amount...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 20, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 7, 12-- Illegal gratification - Once it is proved that money was demanded as bribe and same was received then S.20 of the Act comes into play - Once there is a presumption as contemplated u/s 20, it is for the accused to establish that the amount was not received as bribe - Accused not explained as to why..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 20-- Illegal gratification - Acquittal by trial Court - Conviction by High Court - Recovery proved - Burden of rebuttal shifted upon accused who failed to rebut the same - Plea that it was not bribe but it was repayment of loan - Number of notes matched with the numbers noted in the ACB - Bushirt..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Mere recovery of tainted money by itself cannot prove the charge of prosecution against the accused in the absence of any evidence to prove payment of bribe or to show that accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be bribe...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)(i), 20-- Illegal gratification - Bribe money recovered from possession of accused - Conviction on the sole testimony of complainant - PW in whose presence the bribe was given not examined - Presumption under S.20 of the Act raised - Accused convicted on the sole testimony of complainant as the same was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7-- Illegal gratification - Complainant handing bribe money to co-accused at the asking of accused - Co-accused acquitted - There was no material to show that co-accused had knowledge regarding money being bribe money - Moreover co-accused had no role to do any favour...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Illegal gratification - Accused caught red handed while taking bribe - Acceptance of bribe video graphed using departmental Video Camera - Conviction by trial Court - High Court upheld conviction - No reason to disagree with findings of trial Court and High Court...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12-- Bribe - Rs.10,000 paid to Police Inspector who was investigating a murder case - Accused acquitted as : (1) offence took place at 7 in the morning and FIR lodged at 11.30 when police station was at a distance of 50 yards; (2) DSP reached place of occurrence only at 11.30 a.m. and no reason why he..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Appeal against grant of bail - Murder - Grant of bail on the basis that extra judicial confession of one of the co-accused may not stand the test of scrutiny by a judicial mind by itself is not sufficient to grant bail - Evidence of involvement of accused with the investigation prior to..........

Showing : 31-40 of 58 Results