Showing : 991-1000 of 1335 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 245(2), 211-- Production by documents, by accused, at the stage of framing of charge - Accused has no right to produce any material...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 218-- Framing of joint charges - Duty of court - Held, Court has to consider the travails and tribulations that victim and other witnesses might face if trial is held separately, as prayed for by petitioners - Prosecution is also likely to examine several female students who are studying under the..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 219, 223(a)- - Framing of joint charges - Continuity of offences - Held, S.219 of the Code cannot be read in isolation - It is to be read along with Ss.220, 221, 223 of the Code - S.223 is with regard to what persons may be charged jointly - It has been stated therein that following persons may be charged and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20, 36A(4), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2)-- Charas - Recovery of 11-1/2 kg. - Challan not presented within 180 days - No application for extension filed - Accused is entitled to bail u/s 167(2) Cr.P.C. - In the instant case bail not granted as recovery was heavy and charge-sheet filed on 196th day of arrest - Once charge sheet is filed..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 222-- Charge - Accused when charged with a major offence and the said charge if not proved, then accused can be convicted of a minor offence if such a case is made out though he was not charged with the same...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 222-- Charge - Any error or omission in framing charge can be rectified even at the appellate stage provided no prejudice is caused to the accused persons...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B-- Cheating - Criminal conspiracy - Discharge of accused - Validity - Highly wrong procedure adopted by revenue agency to effect change in revenue record by passing provisions of law applicable to it - Accused persons charge-sheeted u/ss 420 & 120-B IPC - Held, from the facts on record, prima-facie..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 207, 227, 452-- Charge - After framing of charge Magistrate has no jurisdiction to recall such order on ground that prosecution had failed to comply with the provision of S.207 Cr.P.C. - At the stage of framing charge Court can only look into the material produced by prosecution while giving an opportunity to the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 464, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 326, 149-- Omission to charge u/s 149 IPC - Omission to mention S.149 in the charge is only an irregularity and since no prejudice has been caused to appellants by that omission it can't affect their conviction - Appellants were aware of the basic ingredients of the offence for which they are being convicted..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 101, 34, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(c)(d), 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2)-- Quashing of charges on the ground of inordinate delay in recording of FIR and filing of charge sheet - FIR recorded in year 1987 for the offences allegedly committed in the year 1981 - Charge sheet submitted in 1991 - Trial did not commence till 1999 - Delay not attributable to appellant -..........

Showing : 991-1000 of 1335 Results