Showing : 151-160 of 264 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Accused was a driver who used to drive lorry owned by complainant - Case of complainant that he had lent Rs.4,85,000/- to accused and cheque given by accused in discharge of debt got dishonoured - Complaint failed to produce any document to show that he..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - There were business transactions between complainant and accused and some amount was due from accused to complainant - There were so many transactions between parties - Complainant failed to produce relevant bill books and entries in account books -..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Part payment made - Claim for the entire amount - Complaint not sustainable - Acquittal, upheld...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Demand notice - Complainant was informed about dishonored cheque on 19.10.2006 - Demand notice was sent on 20.11.2006 i.e. on 31st day from the date of knowledge - Held, notice was not sent within stipulated period of 30 days - Acquittal of accused-respondent proper...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - According to complainant, cheque issued by accused towards repayment of borrowed amount of Rs.4 lakhs was dishonoured - No document was obtained by complainant pertaining to said transaction - No other evidence was adduced by complainant to prove the said transaction - Held,..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - No evidence what so ever adduced by complainant to prove the actual lending of money and due execution of cheque - Held, Court below is perfectly justified in finding that preponderance of probabilities lies in favour of the case advanced by defence -..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Trial - Acquittal of accused u/s 256(1) of CrPC - Validity - Dishonour of cheque covering an amount of Rs.66,200/- - Held, one more opportunity can be given to complainant/appellant to prosecute matter on merit and to have a decision on merit thereof - But because of laches..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Non-appearance of complainant - Acquittal of accused u/s 256(1) of CrPC - Validity - Cheque in question covers an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- - Court has taken cognizance of offence - There is no decision on merit - Accused has not so far entered appearance and plea of accused is..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 87-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Complainant has failed to prove beyond all doubts that overwriting and change in the date of cheque was made by accused, cheque itself had become void in view of S.87 of the N.I. Act, as there was material alteration in the same - Accused has been able..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Non-appearance of complainant - Acquittal of accused u/s.256(1) of CrPC - Validity - Cheque in question covers an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- - Court has taken cognizance of offence - There is no decision on merit - Held, one more opportunity should be granted to appellant to..........

Showing : 151-160 of 264 Results