Showing : 211-220 of 264 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued towards loan advanced by complainant - Loan transaction not supported by any document - Loan transaction not reflected in account books of complainant who is trader of food grains - Complainant did not examine any witness with respect to alleged transaction -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity of - Notice has been issued by appellants-complainants - Cheques have been presented before Bank which were dishonoured - Notice has been issued in accordance with the provisions of law and has been received by respondent - Neither reply was sent by..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Loan amount returned by accuse - There was no liability made out as claimed by complainant - Complaint was not only dishonestly filed, but was filed for an amount which was not due and payable by the accused - Acquittal, held, proper...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued to discharge loan amount - Signatures on cheque admitted - All the requirements of S.138 fully complied with - Acquittal set aside - Accused convicted...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint cannot be dismissed questioning the financial soundness of the complainant to lend the amount - Statutory presumption not rebutted - Ingredients of offence made out - Acquittal, held, not proper - Accused convicted...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Non appearance of complaint - Acquittal of accused - Proprietary of - At the time of acquittal of accused by invoking provision of S.256 CrPC, NBW was pending against accused - Held, presence of complainant was not necessary - It is the duty of the Court to see that NBW was..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Material alteration - Figure `25' added in front of figure `2500' so as to read it as `2,52,500' with different pen and ink - Opinion of handwriting expert that cheque had been tampered with - Said fact in itself is sufficient to acquit accused - Acquittal - Leave to appeal..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Hand loan of Rs.50, 000/- - Denied by accused - Complainant having no financial capacity to lend the loan amount - Except cheque no other documentary proof - S.269-SS of Income Tax Act, 1961 insists that all transactions involving Rs.20, 000/- and above, should be through..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - No document to show loan - Persons in whose presence loan was given not examined - Evidence of PW2 inconsistent and contradictory - Cheques were given as part repayment of purchase money of the shop - Complainant had no financial capacity to advance loan - Defence probable -..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Not issued within time - Acquittal upheld - Bank vide its letter dt.13.1.2003 intimated its dishonour - Complainant issued notice on 8.2.2003 - Amendment of notice period from 15 days to 30 days brought into force on 6.2.2003 - Amendment not retrospective in nature -..........

Showing : 211-220 of 264 Results