Showing : 131-140 of 284 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Non bailable warrant pending against accused - Dismissal of complaint u/s.256 Cr.P.C. - Validity - Held, where complainant is represented by a pleader or by officer conducting prosecution or where Magistrate is of opinion that personal attendance of complainant is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4), 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Dismissal for no, prosecution - Acquittal - Petition seeking leave to appeal filed alongwith application for condonation of delay of 28 days - Minor issues like absence of their main counsel on date fixed in trial Court, failure to give intimation by counsel..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Complainant/petitioner failed to disclose material particulars about alleged loan of Rs.2,45,000/- given to respondents/accused - He categorically stated that he could not state specific amount, month or year of amounts paid to accused persons - There..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Non-appearance of complainant - Acquittal of accused - Challenge to - Vital rights of appellant bank are involved before Trial Court - Held, impugned order dismissing complaint and acquitting accused liable to be set aside - Complaint restored - Cost of..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Complainant's case that cheque issued by accused to repay advance of Rs.10 lacs given to him by complainant got dishonoured - Accused challenged the fact that complainant had advanced Rs.10 lacs to him - Accused was able to bring on record fact that..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 143, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 326(3)-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Successor Magistrate decided the case in summary trial on the basis of part of the substance of evidence recorded by his predecessor - Held, he was not in a position to appreciate the evidence properly and decide the case effectively - This caused..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Complainant failed to prove that amount as stated in complaint was advanced to accused and cheque in question was given towards discharge of such liability - Except oral evidence of complainant, he did not produce any evidence to show that he had..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity - Complainant alleged that accused gave cheque in question towards discharge of liability of price of grains purchased by him - There was no documentary evidence to show transaction - Complainant did not return cheques taken as security despite payment -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 468, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Cheating - Quashing of complaint - Petitioner/accused has stated that he was in financial difficulty and was unable to repay loan amounts and had no intention to cheat or dishonestly divert loan amount - Held, all these defences can be put forth and considered during trial -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint on behalf of firm - Manager signed complaint on 20.09.1999 - In list of documents, first document is mentioned as "Power of Attorney in favour of complainant dated 21.09.1999" - Before he was appointed as power of attorney he signed complaint - Held, on date of..........

Showing : 131-140 of 284 Results