Showing : 91-100 of 478 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Place of occurrence verified pursuant to information supplied on behalf of accused - However, place of occurrence was already known to police, in as much as, it is the same place from where dead body of deceased was recovered - Verification of place by accused..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of tempo at the instance of accused - Tempo was recovered from open place and not from conscious possession of accused - Witnesses of recovery were examined by prosecution but they have not uttered a single word regarding said recovery being effected in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B(4)-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Call details - No evidence on record as to how call details brought on record to connect accused with commission of crime - Moreover, no evidence with regard to call details could be proved unless competent officer of concerned cell phone company came forward to..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 394, 302-- Robbery and murder - A-2 roped into crime only on the basis of mobile conversation with deceased - Mentioned Sim was in possession of A-2 as a result of which he was apprehended - However, said Sim number did not stand in the name of A-2 - Prosecution failed to establish that A-2 had conversation..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 511, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Penile injury - There is no associated injuries over any part of body either in front portion or in the back portion - Contention that penile injury is possible on account of a fall rejected - Penile injury therefore, caused is not an injury sustained but it is..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 511, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Penile injury - A-1 is the beneficiary under Will executed by deceased in his favour - He is therefore the most interested person to cause death of deceased - Moreover, deceased was under the care and custody of A-1 - It is within the personal knowledge of A-1 to..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 511, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Penile injury - Only evidence against A-3 is that he took deceased while he was fighting for his life in an ambulance to Government Hospital - It is not alleged that A-3 was involved in causing injury to deceased - No evidence on record as to whether A-3 took..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 394, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - As per prosecution, accused persons committed murder of deceased and looted his motorcycle - However, no eye-witness as to occurrence of incidence - Even, there is no evidence against accused as to involvement in crime - Recovery of broken pieces of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - When prosecution's case is based on circumstantial evidence, what is required to be proved is complete chain of circumstances without leaving any conclusion consistent with the innocence of accused - It must be shown that in all human probability, the act, with..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen evidence - Deceased was last seen alive in company of accused and accused did not satisfactorily explain missing of deceased - Same is a strong mitigating circumstance against accused - Last seen evidence proved...........

Showing : 91-100 of 478 Results