Showing : 281-290 of 456 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 1, 4(4)-- Death of sole defendant during pendency of application U.O.9.R.7 CPC - Plaintiff failing to bring on record L.R's within time - No application for setting aside abatement filed by plaintiff thereafter - Suit automatically abated on date of death of sole defendant...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4(4)-- Death of sole defendant during pendency of application U.O.9.R.7 CPC - Plaintiff himself submitted application for bringing on record LRs of defendant - Suit could not have proceeded without deciding said application - Court was under obligation to issue notice to LRs of defendant - Finding of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4-- Exparte order - Setting aside - Death of defendant during pendency of application - Plaintiff informing Court about death of defendant but did not apply to bring on record L.R's - Order of trial Court that suit had abated - Appellate Court remanding case to trial Court - Trial Court allowing..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97-- Eviction petition - Execution - Death of tenant - Legal heirs of tenant become only joint tenants and not tenants in common - Eviction decree against one of the joint tenants - Decree is binding on other joint tenants - Objection to execution of decree by other joint tenant - Not tenable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 15-- Joint decree holders - Death of one D.H. - During pendency of execution and after death of deceased D.H. his heirs executed a relinquishment deed in favour of remaining D.H's - Provision of O.21.R.15 CPC is applicable and execution can proceed without bringing on record L.R's of deceased D.H...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9, 3, 4-- Litigant ought not to be denied opportunity of having a Us determined on merits unless he has, by gross negligence, deliberate inaction or something akin to misconduct, disentitled himself from seeking indulgence of Court - For a period of ninety days from the date of death of any party^Suit..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4(3), 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(k)-- Death of one of the defendants - Impleading of L.R's - Failure to implead - Suit does not abate when one or some of the legal representative are already on record though in a different capacity...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 16, 15(5), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3-- Eviction order - Revision against - Death of revision petitioner during pendency of revision - Revisional Court has inherent power to being L.R's on record - Limitation of 3 years prescribed U.O.22.R.3 is not applicable to proceedings under Rent Act...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, 52, 60-- Execution - Compensation awarded to legal representatives on the death of a person does not form part of the estate of the deceased and cannot be attached in execution of decree against the deceased...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 2, 4, 6, 11-- Death of one of defendant during pendency of appeal against decree in partition suit - When right to appeal survives on death of one of several defendants, but his L.R's not brought on record within period of limitation, appeal abates - Judgment pronounced by first Appellate Court when appeal had..........

Showing : 281-290 of 456 Results