Showing : 3001-3010 of 19681 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay condonation and restoration application - Can be decided simultaneously - However, in the event of an order being passed on delay condonation and restoration application, main matter on merits should not be decided on the same date so as to enable the party aggrieved to challenge the order..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of a party - Suit for declaration and injunction - Petitioner purchased property from plaintiff prior to institution of suit - Said property included in scheduled property - If suit of plaintiff is decreed it will affect right of petitioner - Petitioner is absolute owner of scheduled..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 10, Rule 2-- Examination of a party - Application U.O.10.R.2 CPC is not required - Even if such an application is filed the same is not barred and cannot be held to be not maintainable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 10, Rule 2-- Examination of a party - Not mandatory - Court not under an obligation to orally examine the party in each and every case...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4-- Recording of evidence by video/audio/teleconferencing or internet conferencing - It is legally permissible both in civil, criminal and matrimonial matters, where attendance of witness cannot be ensured without delay, expenses and inconvenience...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 10, Rule 2-- Order rejecting application U.O.10.R.2 CPC - Revision against the same is not maintainable, as said order is purely interlocutory in nature and is not a case decided within the meaning of S.115 CPC - It is thus open for judicial review, if necessary u/art 227 of the Constitution...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4-- Recording of evidence - Words `Witness in attendance' shall be taken as person being present - It need not be physical presence, thus, recording of evidence through audio, video link or through internet by Skype or similar technological device is permissible complying words in attendance...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of Plaint - Subsequent events - Having material bearing on the rights of parties - Proposed amendment is relatable to original suit and continuity of plea in the suit which would be having effect of elaboration of stand of parties at a subsequent stage - Proposed amendment was just and..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 4(4), 12-- Recording of evidence on commission - Commissioner has to observe and record demeanor of witnesses or such other remarks or objections in depositions as per O.18.Rr.4(4), 12 CPC - While video or internet recording of evidence and presenting same in electronic disk, Court during arguments can go..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16-- Presence of parties and witnesses - Does not mean actual physical presence either in Court or before officer of Court, particularly in matrimonial matters...........

Showing : 3001-3010 of 19681 Results