Showing : 91-100 of 113 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Husband filed petition u/s 9 Hindu Marriage Act - Ad interim injunction restraining wife from remarrying - Injunction cannot be granted - In a matrimonial proceeding not being a proceeding of the nature specified in clauses (a), (b) or (c) of Rule 1 or in sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of O.39, temporary..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Suit for declaration of title simpliciter - Court has power under Order 39 Rr.1, 2 or even in S.151 to grant ad interim injunction pending suit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Suit for declaration of title simpliciter - Court has power under Order 39 Rr.1, 2 or even in S.151 to grant ad interim injunction pending suit..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary mandatory injunction - Can be granted if (1) The plaintiff has a strong case for trial of a higher standard than a prima facie case, normally required for a prohibitory injunction (2) It is necessary to prevent irreparable or serious injury which normally cannot be compensated in terms..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Case not covered U.O.39.Rr.1, 2 - Trial Court can grant injunction in exercise of inherent powers...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Prin-ciples governing - Three principles viz (1) Prima facie case (2) Balance of con-venience (3) Irreparably injury - All the three conditions to be established - Prima facie case does not mean to examine the merits of the case closely - Plaintiff need not to establish..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- The thrust of Rule 2-A is not of implementation of the order but of punishment of violation of order of injunction or of undertaking given to the Court...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- Disobedience of injunction - Court does not become functus officio on decision of the case and the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A cannot be dismissed solely on that ground...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Eviction petition - Compromise - Eviction decree passed - Tenant taking some persons as partners - Partnership firm claiming itself to be tenant - Held, there is no privity of contract between the firm and the landlord - Application U.O.39 Rr.1, 2 seeking stay of execution of eviction decree..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 104, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- Order of detention In civil prison passed under order 39 Rule 2-A for flouting order of Injunction - Order is appealable under S.104(h) of the Code...........

Showing : 91-100 of 113 Results