LawMirror.com

Results of claim motor accident

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 51-60 of 386 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Death - Claim petition by sons of deceased - No loss of dependency - Claimant, if the legal representative, will be entitled to compensation...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Death - Claim petition by sons of deceased - Legal representative of deceased are entitled to file a claim petition and it is not necessary that they should be dependent upon the deceased...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Income of carpenter - Income of carpenter can only be proved by oral evidence - Income of carpenter assessed as Rs.5,000/- per month - Adding 40% for future prospectus, deducting 1/5 for personal expenses keeping in view of large number of dependents and applying multiplier of 16, compensation works out to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Enhancement of - Taking into account age of deceased, dependency of claimants on deceased and amounts awarded by High Court under the heads of loss of love and affection, loss of estate, funeral expenses, and Interest awarded by Tribunal maintained - Courts below failed to grant future prospect @ 40% of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Accident - Claim petition - Condonation of delay of 66 days - Dismissal of petition for delay in filing - Claimants stating that there was no responsible person to take action against award of Tribunal as they were widow and minor children of deceased - Also Tribunal passed award without examination..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Claim petition - Judgment of criminal case is certainly not binding upon the Tribunal - Tribunal has to reach its own conclusion on the basis of evidence adduced before it - Even it is taken that eye-witness had resiled during the trial, however, if they support the case of claimants in proceedings u/s 166 of the Act,..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 50(1) -- Accidental claim - Transfer of a vehicle - Liability of transferor - Accident occurred within 30 days of transfer - Transfer not made in accordance with S.50 of the Act - So long as name of transferor continues in RTO records, he remains liable to a third person - Transferor held, not absolved from his liability...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - If Court did not exhibit documents despite claimants referring them at the time of recording evidence then in such event, claimants cannot be denied their right to claim compensation, particularly, when they proved their case and respondents did nothing to counter them - It was nothing but a procedural..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Death - Dismissal of claim petition - Mere recovery of broken pieces of number plate from the spot of accident may point only towards the fact that there was involvement of alleged offending vehicle - However, second limb u/s 166 of the Act that accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of alleged offending..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Injury - Permanent disability - Plea of claimants that Tribunal erred in giving undue importance to FIR and testimony of respondent no.1 who was interested witness - Plea held, tenable as FIR cannot be taken to be substantive evidence - In the instant case, author of FIR was illiterate person who was at that time lodged..........

Showing : 51-60 of 386 Results