Showing : 1241-1250 of 18083 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 3A-- Ex parte temporary injunction order - Disposal of application within 30 days - Plea that defendant gets a right of appeal if application is not decided within 30 days - Held, that right is always available only when he is ready to argue by putting forth his defence...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Object of O.1.R.10(2) CPC is that no `lis' should be dismissed on technical grounds but should be decided on merits...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Amendment of plaint - Partition suit - Amendment sought to add certain properties and necessary parties to suit - Suit for partition is not tenable unless all co-owners are joined as parties - Co-owners are necessary parties to suit and suit should not be dismissed for no, joinder of necessary..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9-- Jurisdiction of civil Court - Question with regard to validity of a Trade mark - Not to be decided by Civil Court and is required to be decided by Registrar or High Court under Trade and Merchandise Marks Act or by Registrar or Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) under Trade Marks Act -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11-- Res judicata - Question involved in subsequent suit for cancellation of sale deed as to whether petitioner had any right in property during life time of his father was already decided in earlier suit for permanent injunction - This would operate as res judicata - Subsequent suit dismissed being..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Legal representatives of deceased defendant are not entitled to take a defence, which is at variance with defence already taken by deceased defendant...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3-- Closure of plaintiffs evidence - Six effective opportunities for concluding evidence were availed by plaintiff but evidence not concluded - Case was adjourned for evidence of defendant - However, taking into account that plaintiff is to be cross-examined and is to lead evidence through one more..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1A(3)-- Taking document on record U.O.8.R.1-A(3) CPC - Trial Court is not required to pronounce upon admissibility of document - Objection regarding admissibility to be considered by trial Court at the time of marking exhibit...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Ex parte order passed on 22.11.2011 - Petitioner filed an application I.A.No.71 of 2015 - Delay by itself not a ground to set aside ex parte order - Ex parte order set aside...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of a party - Suit for injunction - Petitioner claims to be owner in possession of a portion of suit land - However, petitioner herself admitted that her plot was different from suit property - Application for impleadment rightly rejected...........

Showing : 1241-1250 of 18083 Results