Showing : 5181-5190 of 19364 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38-- Permanent injunction - Trial Court found that appellant failed to produce any evidence with regard to title over suit property - Suit property was a nazool property and its ownership vested in Punjab Govt. and was transferred in name of Improvement Trust - Possession was also delivered to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - If defendant is permitted to alienate disputed property then it will give rise to multiplicity of suits, which is not legally permissible - Order of status quo, upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 10-- Stay of proceedings - Rejection of - Validity - Plaintiff filed suit for decree of declaration to effect that impugned power of attorney, agreement to sell, letter of possession and receipt etc. are illegal and contrary to law and not binding on his rights - Defendant contested suit filed written..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte eviction order - Setting aside - Service of summons - Petitioner No.1 not found at spot and his father refused to accept summons on behalf of his son - Held, when petitioner No.1 was not found at spot, Court should have made another effort to effect service on petitioner No.1 so that lis..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(vi), 7(c)- - Rejection of plaint - Suit for declaration that sale deed is null and void - Plaintiff not party to the registered sale deed - If plaintiff is not executant of sale deed he is not required to pay ad valorem court fee - Order dismissing application - Calls for no interference...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 34-- Declaratory suit pertaining to forged guarantee documents - Rejection of plaint - Jurisdiction of civil Court - Held, S.34 of the Act bars jurisdiction of civil Court in case documents of loan/guarantee transaction are valid and genuine - But in present case, since forged guarantee documents..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte Decree - Setting aside - No court shall set aside a decree passed ex-parte merely on the ground that there had been an irregularity in service of summons, if the court was satisfied that defendant had notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer plaintiff's..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte Decree - Setting aside - Non-receipt of notice - Condonation of delay - Merely because instead of word `Secretary' word `Manager' had been written on the address which was otherwise complete - It would not be sufficient to hold that no, applicant college was not served, more particularly..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 102, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136-- Petty cases - Filing of SLP - An amount of Rs.8,724/- is to be paid to respondent employee as reimbursement of his medical claim challenged by way of SLP - Held, petitioner Haryana Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited treating litigation as luxury must have spent amount already by..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 13A-- Shamalat deh - Ad interim injunction - Rejection of - Land in dispute is a shamlat deh and Gram Panchayat is described its owner in revenue record - Kind of land shows as Tibba and Choe (no, cultivable) - Revenue record in which Gram Panchayat has been described as owner of disputed land was never..........

Showing : 5181-5190 of 19364 Results