Showing : 3911-3920 of 11918 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125-- Interim maintenance - Normally to be granted from the date of filing of application for interim maintenance...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 380, 457-- Bail - Theft of gold jewelry & mobile phone from a residential house - Petitioner in judicial custody - Trial likely to take a long time - Continuous detention of petitioner as an under trial is not warranted - Bail granted...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 195, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 193, 194, 195, 196, 200-- Offence punishable u/ss 193 to 196 and 200 IPC - Cognizance can be taken only upon a complaint in writing, by Court before whom such false evidence has been given, or by an officer of such Court - FIR is not maintainable...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, proviso put `victim' at higher pedestal than prosecuting agency or complainant in matter of preferring an appeal against any order of a criminal Court acquitting accused or convicting..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 504-- Quashing of complaint - Petitioner/accused alleged to have committed offence punishable u/s.504 IPC - Respondent/complainant had no case that accused had used any abusive words in front of him or addressed any letter to him containing such provocative words - Merely because certain things were..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, right of `victim' to prefer an appeal in terms of said proviso to S.372 is an unqualified right and no `leave to appeal' or `special leave' is required to be obtained by him/her for..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), S.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, no limitation of time has been provided by Legislature for exercise of such right of appeal by `victim' in terms of said proviso - Hence, in the fact and circumstances of each case,..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Held, proviso to S.372 Cr.P.C. came into operation w.e.f. December 31, 2009 - Hence, in absence of any legislative intent to contrary, in all cases, in which a judgment and order has been passed by a..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Period of limitation - Computation of - Held, for the purpose of computing period of limitation, relevant date is the date of filing complaint/date of institution of prosecution and not the date on which Magistrate takes cognizance...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), Ss.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, if subject of crime is dead or incapacitated to extent or suffers from such a disability that he/she cannot take steps to exercise his/her right under proviso to S.372, any of his/her..........

Showing : 3911-3920 of 11918 Results