Showing : 501-510 of 1361 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Cognizance of offence - Legality - Cheques issued by borrower in Factoring Agreement got dishonoured - Prima facie, same were towards petitioners' liability which was co-extensive with debtor - At this stage, it cannot be said that cheques issued by petitioners were only..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 120B-- Offence u/ss 420, 406, 120-B IPC - Complainant convicted u/s 138 NI Act - Complainant alleging misuse of the same very cheque - Such a frivolous prosecution cannot be permitted to be continued - Order taking cognizance quashed...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 177, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 345-- Concealment of order passed in an earlier petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. - During the existence of that order petitioners preferred a criminal misc. writ petition and sought the same relief - Offence u/s 177 IPC is committed - As the offence was committed in Court and S.345 Cr.P.C. empowers a Court to..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 406, 504, 506, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 173-- Offence u/ss 498-A, 406, 504 & 506 IPC and Ss.3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act - Territorial jurisdiction - Act of dory demand and harassment was either made at Lucknow or at Jaipur - No mention in FIR that offence was committed partly at Jaipur and partly at Varanasi - No whisper that offence is..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - Absence of necessary averments in complaint - Court should not take cognizance of offence against such Director...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 20, 20A, 17, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 305, 319-- Offence by company - Sample of `Fruit Yogurt' was found to be not conforming to standard of `Fruit Yogurt' - Prosecution of directors - Held, provision of S.20A could be used only to summon manufacturer, distributor or dealer - Cognizance could not be taken against directors of company - Summoning..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
, Section 2(d), 190, 185- - Drunken driving - Offence of - Filing of charge-sheet by police - Amounts to complaint - Held, documents (though called as charge-sheets) submitted to Magistrate by police alleging commission of offences punishable u/s 185 of the MV Act on the basis of which Magistrate takes cognizance are deemed..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 170, 173, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 174A-- Submission of chase-sheet - Duty of Investigating Officer - Held, while submitting charge-sheet IO has to inform Magistrate whether accused is in jail or on bail or is being forwarded with charge-sheet - If charge-sheet is being submitted after declaring accused as absconder, a case u/s 174-A of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B-- Order of cognizance - Quashment - No case of forgery of documents committed after document was custodia legis - S.195 Cr.P.C. wrongly applied - Impugned order set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12, 18, 19(1), 20, 22, 23-- Complaint against husband, parents and sister of husband - Complainant not residing with parents and sister of husband since 2004 - Complaint filed in the year 2010 - Complaint that when she was pregnant she was subjected to sex determination test in the year 2001 - Held, qua the alleged incident..........

Showing : 501-510 of 1361 Results