Showing : 91-100 of 208 Results

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Delay in cognizance of offence - Complaint lodged within 12 days of commission of alleged offence - Held, crucial date for computing the period of limitation is neither the date of taking cognizance by Magistrate, nor the date of issuance of process, nor the date on which prosecution sanction was..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Unless the complaint discloses a cognizable offence Court cannot take cognizance - Mere mention of sections and language of those sections is not sufficient - Particulars of offence committed by each and every accused and the role played by each and every accused in committing that offence must be..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 191, 182, 209, 420, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Respondent and petitioner, husband and wife - Petitioner got a criminal case registered against respondent u/ss 498-A, 406 and 506(ii) IPC - Respondent also filed a petition for divorce - Respondent filed private complaint u/ss 191, 182, 209 and 420 IPC against petitioner, her counsel and others..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190-- Order taking cognizance of offence - Allegations that accused General Manager and Deputy General Manager inspsite of telephonic instructions by complainant to management of hotel, did not provide lunch to foreign tourists - Case registered u/s 342, 499, 500, 427 read with S.120-B IPC - Complaint..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- FIR lodged against petitioner for offences u/s 379 and 427 IPC - FIR found false during investigation by police - Police report submitted against informant u/s 182 and 211 of the Code and cognizance taken - Held, once Magistrate had taken cognizance against informant for filing false case, it is..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Cognizance of offence by Magistrate u/ss 341 and 294 of IPC on a complaint - Alleged occurrence took place on 1.9.2002 - Complaint filed on 10.6.2004 - Period of limitation prescribed u/s 468 (2) Cr.P.C. is period of one year from the date of occurrence - Held, time barred cognizance bad in law -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, 200, 203-- Criminal complaint - Inaction by police - Criminal complaint can be filed - Magistrate to enquire into the complaint - If Magistrate after recording evidence finds a prima facie case, instead of issuing process to the accused, he is empowered to direct the police concerned to investigate into the..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 202-- Additional evidence - Complaint case - Witnesses sought to be examined not cited in the complaint - Said witnesses not examined at the pre cognizance stage of the case - Witnesses sought to be examined medical experts and relevant documentary evidence pertaining to examination of the witnesses..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Procedure Code, 1989, Section 200, 204-- Cognizance of offence - Complaint filed on the allegation that vehicle in question was taken away from the possession of the petitioner/complainant - Complaint prima facie disclosing commission of offence - Magistrate directed enquiry and took cognizance of offence on perusal of enquiry report -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 177, 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 406-- Offence u/ss 498-A, 406 IPC - Jurisdiction - Occurrence took place at matrimonial home in State of Andhra Pradesh - Offence of harassment and dowry demand not a continuous offence - Averments in complaint not showing that cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of Magistrate who took..........

Showing : 91-100 of 208 Results