LawMirror.com

Results of commission petition

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 91-100 of 341 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1) -- Special Leave Petition - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Concurrent findings by the State Commission and the National Commissioner that the respondent had suffered blindness due to accident and he was entitled to the insurance amount does not suffer from any legal..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Surveyors' report - Ground that bus was carrying more number of passengers than the permissible number at the time of accident - It had not been held anywhere that accident was caused on account of violation of this condition of policy - As per report of the Surveyor immediate cause of the accident was the high water level in that Naia..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Surveyors' report - Ground that bus was carrying more number of passengers than the permissible number at the time of accident - It had not been held anywhere that accident was caused on account of violation of this condition of policy - As per report of the Surveyor immediate cause of the accident was the high water level in that Nala..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Quashing of criminal proceedings - Ground of delay - Proper charge sheet was filed after more than 20 years from commission of offence - During this period, prosecution was responsible for seeking adjournments from Court for filing of charge-sheet - Accused has already been exonerated in relation to major charges by Addl...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 16 -- Writ jurisdiction - Quo warranto - Appointment - Lady Member - State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission - Experience - Selection Committee was satisfied that respondent No. 3 had 10 years of experience of teaching school children - This was the requirement of eligibility as per the..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 16 -- Writ jurisdiction - Quo warranto - Appointment - Lady Member -State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission - Experience - Selection Committee was satisfied that respondent No.3 had 10 years of experience of teaching school children - This was the requirement of eligibility as per the..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 16 -- Writ jurisdiction - Quo warranto - Appointment - Lady Member - State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission - Experience - Selection Committee was satisfied that respondent No. 3 had 10 years of experience of teaching school children - This was the requirement of eligibility as per the..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied second - hand engines..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied second - hand engines..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied secondhand engines..........

Showing : 91-100 of 341 Results