LawMirror.com

Results of company

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1251-1260 of 3167 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Driving licence - Fake driving licence - The claim was repudiated on the grounds that in violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, the driver of the insured Truck which met with accident did not have a genuine licence - Petitioner - Insurance Company on whom the onus to prove that the licence was fake has produced a..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Driving licence - Fake driving licence - The claim was repudiated on the grounds that in violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, the driver of the insured Truck which met with accident did not have a genuine licence - Petitioner - Insurance Company on whom the onus to prove that the licence was fake has produced a..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Mediclaim Insurance policy - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of facts - Preexisting disease - Exclusion clause - The Discharge Summary of the patient-life assured reflect that she was suffering from Left Renal Calculus for the last one and half year but at the same time there is nothing on record to..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied second - hand engines..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied second - hand engines..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Harvester combine - Defective engine - Compensation - Enhancement of compensation - Respondent has not preferred any revision petition against the order of State Commission - The order has attained finality so far as the respondent is concerned - The allegation that respondent supplied secondhand engines..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Contract of Insurance -- Petitioner-Insurance Company expressed willingness to accept Rs.15 lakh as premium for providing insurance coverage under a Scheme to all farmers, farm labourers and Mandi workers in the State of Punjab - Two days before the commencement of the Insurance policy enhanced premium demanded by clarifying the reasons for demanding a much higher premium..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Contract of Insurance -- Petitioner - Insurance Company expressed willingness to accept Rs. 15 lakh as premium for providing insurance coverage under a Scheme to all farmers, farm labourers and Mandi workers in the State of Punjab - Two days before the commencement of the Insurance policy enhanced premium demanded by clarifying the reasons for demanding a much higher..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138,141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Prosecution of Director - It is not sufficient to make a bald cursory statement in a complaint that a Director is incharge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company - Complaint should spell out as to how and in what manner the Director was incharge..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance Act, 1938, Section 45, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 13(4) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - Adverse inference - Ailment of gall bladder and CRD stones which has no nexus with death of insured due to breast cancer - Specific averment by complainant that ailment disclosed to the agent by the policy holder but agent..........

Showing : 1251-1260 of 3167 Results