LawMirror.com

Results of company act

Showing : 961-970 of 1831 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 10 -- Company - There is no statutory compulsion that the person-in-charge or an officer of the company may not be prosecuted unless he be ranged alongside the company itself...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 10 -- Company - Contravention of order made u/s 3 by a company - Persons who may be held guilty are : (1) the company (2) person incharge and responsible to the company; (3) any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company - Any one, some or all of them may be prosecuted - There is no statutory compulsion that the..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Non standard claim - Violation of terms and conditions of policy - Vehicle insured as private vehicle used as taxi when it was stolen - Order passed by the fora below directing the petitioner - Insurance Company to settle the claim on non standard basis to pay 75% of the admissible claim warrant no interference under Section 21(b) of the CP..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(m), 2(1)(d), 3, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 3(42) -- Company - Can be consumer and can maintain complaint...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g) -- Consumer - Deficiency in service - Non supply of electricity by Power Transmission Corporation to manufacturing company within time fixed under contract - Amounts to deficiency of service - Company is competent to maintain a complaint regrading such deficiency in service in a Consumer Forum...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64UM1(A) , 2 , 3 , 4 -- Insurance claim - Surveyor's report - Expert report - Repudiation of claim - Surveyor's report assessed the loss at Rs. 2,50,923 - Claim repudiated on the basis of Expert report - In view of Section 64UM 1(A), 2, 3 and 4 the petitioner company had no competence..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - In the absence of incriminating circumstances, a Director of a company cannot be deemed to be in-charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its day-to-day business...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - Not a signatory to the cheque - To fasten the liability on the Director of a Company for offence u/s 138 of the Act, it is necessary to see the averments contained in the complaint qua that director...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - Specific role not assigned to the petitioner to indicate that he was engaged in the day-to-day affairs and management of the company - Complaint quashed qua petitioner...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17 -- Company - Offence u/ss 7, 16 - Company nominated a person for conduct of its business and the same duly communicated - Prosecution of Managing Director and Director - No averment in complaint that Managing Director and Director are in charge of day to day conduct of the business of the company and responsible for..........

Showing : 961-970 of 1831 Results