Showing : 1-10 of 1502 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recalling of complainant at appellate stage - Change of counsel in appeal by accused who felt that some more questions ought to have asked during cross examination of complainant - Not justified to recall complainant during course of appeal, more particularly when earlier counsel duly..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Summoning of additional accused - Persons named in FIR but not implicated in charge sheet can be summoned to face trial, even if stage of giving opportunity to complainant to file a protest petition urging upon trial Court to summon other persons as well who were named in FIR but not implicated in..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 216-- Alteration of charge from S.306 IPC to S.302 IPC - Charge framed u/s 306 IPC - Complainant or State did not challenge that charge - Satisfaction of trial Court qua charge attained finality - Mere allegation of complainant that his son is murdered is not sufficient to frame charge u/s 302 IPC, in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 395, 397-- Quashing of FIR - Offence u/ss 392, 395, 397 IPC - No proper investigation made by I.O much less concluded on the basis of FIR lodged by complainant and before it could be brought to its logical conclusion, FIR quashed in relation to cognizable offences which were of serious in nature than..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Summoning of additional accused - Matrimonial dispute - Mere disclosing names of accused cannot be said to be strong and cogent evidence to make them face trial for offence u/s 319 Cr.P.C, especially when complainant is husband and has initiated criminal proceedings against family of his i, laws..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319-- Summoning of additional accused - Matrimonial dispute - Husband levelled allegations against wife and his family members - Though in FIR, complainant mentioned 15 women and 35 men came by vehicles but names of 11 persons alone were disclosed in FIR - In the FIR or in statement recorded u/s 161..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal of complaint for no, prosecution - Complainant was present in Court but she being hard of hearing, could not present herself before Court when case was called, as a result complaint was dismissed for no, prosecution - However, immediately next day complainant moved..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 165-- Dishonour of cheque - Case posted for final arguments - Application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. and S.165 Evidence Act for production of documents - Complainant knowingly and as a conscious citizen, participated in the trial - Case is at the fag end of trial as such no indulgence can be granted u/s 311..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 468, 120B-- Quashing of proceedings - Offence u/ss 406, 468, 120-B IPC - Parties settled the dispute amicably - Dispute is of civil in nature - Accused paid the amount of Rs.10 lakhs as agreed between parties - Complainant had no objection if offences are compounded - Proceedings quashed...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145(1), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 251-- Dishonour of cheque - Evidence of complainant by way of affidavit - Cross examination of complainant - Permissible only when accused makes an application by pointing out on what point he wants to cross examine the witness(es) and then only Court shall recall the witness by recording reasons..........

Showing : 1-10 of 1502 Results