Showing : 611-620 of 6226 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 34, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 300, 256-- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal in default for want of prosecution - Tantamounts to acquittal - FIR registered u/ss 420, 406, 34 IPC on the same facts - Merely because in the complaint u/s 138 NI Act, the facts which constitute offences u/s 406/420 IPC may have been laid out, it does not follow..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, 482-- Second complaint - Filed by very same complainant before the same Police Station, having direct effect on the first complaint and allegations forming part of main act and allegation levelled in the first complaint and steps alleged in the second complainant consequences of act alleged in the first..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Insecticides Act, 1968, Section 30(3)-- Liability of dealer - There is no allegation that seals were tampered or packing were not properly stored - Even, complaint is conspicuously silent about said allegations - Moreover, samples were drawn from original packing - Provision of S.30(3) of the Act duly attracted - Proceedings against..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340, 195(1)(b)(i)-- False evidence - If false evidence is clearly immaterial to the decision of the case, a complaint should not ordinarily be made...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 10A, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Madhya Pradesh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2009, Section 11(5)-- FIR - One an information with regard to commission of Cognizable office is received by Police Officer, then it is its duty to register FIR - Police Officer cannot refuse to register FIR on ground that although contents of complaint discloses commission of Cognizable Offence, but as complaint has..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Madhya Pradesh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2009, Section 11(5), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of FIR - Word "Only" cannot be read as to quash FIR on ground that since complaint has not been made by Collector, therefore, Police cannot register FIR on basis of complaint made by any other person, even if same discloses commission of cognizable offence...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Design Act, 2000, Section 19, Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 79, Information Technology "Intermediary Guidelines" Rules, 2011, Rule 3-- Registered design - Infringement - Right of intermediary - Intermediaries only required to declare to all its users its policy and advise them not to host any infringing information on website of intermediary and on receipt of complaint to remove same within 36 hours thus, requiring intermediary..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(c)-- Dishonour of cheque - Pre-mature complaint - Filed before expiry of 15 days from the date of receipt of notice - Complaint cannot be entertained, as drawer/accused cannot be said to have committed any offence till then - However, it is open to payee or holder to file fresh complaint within a month..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, 482, Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015, Section 15-- Cow slaughter - Cognizable offence and no, bailable offence - Police refused to register FIR - Writ u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable - Aggrieved person can approach Superintendent of Police u/s 154(3) Cr.P.C. by application in writing - In case, no satisfactory result come, aggrieved person can..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409-- Compliant u/s 409 IPC - Locus standi - Criminal law can be set in motion by anybody - Prosecution initiated by CBI on behalf of Railway Authorities is thus, justifiable - Moreover, public money is involved in a case, if any illegal transaction takes place, accused is reaping fruits of such money..........

Showing : 611-620 of 6226 Results