Showing : 181-190 of 647 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Stay of proceedings - Submission that since informant has failed to mention in complaint, the date on which notice allegedly sent by him to revisionist, demanding payment of amount payable under cheque in question - Held, it is directed that till next date of listing, further..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(m)(iii), 2(e) &, 3-- Respondent member of cooperative society registered under provisions of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Respondent entered into transaction with petitioner society by joining in a particular scheme - Respondent filed complaint before Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum alleging deficiency..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint on behalf of society - Maintainability - Complainant is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 - No resolution was passed authorizing "N" to lodge a complaint on its behalf - Held, complaint filed by "N" on behalf of society could not have..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14-- Disputed questions - Flat allotment - The complaint involving highly disputed as well as controversial questions which can only be adjudicated upon by leading evidence in regular trial and cannot be decided in summary proceedings under CP Act - Complaint held not maintainable - Appeal filed by the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, Section 3-- Investigation into illegal mining - Powers vested in the CBI to investigate the same - Plea that CBI lacks jurisdiction to investigate offence u/s 22 of the MMRD Act as cognizance of the offence under section 22 of the Act by Court is not permissible except on written complaint by authorized..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, Section 22-- Investigation into illegal mining - Powers vested in the CBI to investigate the same - Plea that CBI lacks jurisdiction to investigate offence u/s 22 of the MMRD Act as cognizance of the offence under section 22 of the Act by Court is not permissible except on written complaint by authorized..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12-- Complaint - Expression `complaint' found in the Act and Rules is used in a generic sense and is not to be understood in the context of a complaint as defined under Cr.P.C. - Respondent who is the opposite party to such application is not an accused as such he cannot be arrested and produced or..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 214, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 15, 10, 2(c)-- Allegations that the respondent offered illegal gratification to public prosecutor in consideration of screening the accused from legal punishment, in a case pending trial before Special Judge - On application moved by public prosecutor, Special Judge prima facie found respondent guilty of..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o), 3-- Gratuity - Claim for - Consumer - Service - Deficiency in service - There is no relationship of consumer between the employer/appellant and the complainant/respondent and consequently there cannot be any deficiency of service by the employer for the purpose of payment of gratuity to the employee..........

Showing : 181-190 of 647 Results