Showing : 431-440 of 894 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Impleading of L.R's - Delay - Condonation - Non impleadment of L.R's for more than one year inspite of knowledge of death of respondents - Reason stated to be busy in filing SLP's in Supreme Court because of time bound cases - Held, it is not sufficient reason in law for condonation of delay - No..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b)-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Delay - Condonation - Opportunity of hearing must be given to accused before condoning delay - Impugned order passed, condoning delay, without issuing notice of application for condonation of delay to accused, set aside...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(2)-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Condonation of delay - Delay can be condoned only after giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused - If application is allowed only then Magistrate has to proceed further on the question as to whether accused is to be summoned or not...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, Section 80, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Election petition - Condonation of delay - Election petition is to be treated and tried like a civil suit to which provision of S.5 of Limitation Act do not apply for purposes of extending the period of limitation...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Incident in question took place on 22.8.2003 - Surveyor submitted report dated 5.1.2007 and claim repudiated vide letter dated 22.2.2007 - Complainant after obtaining reports from two experts submitted the same to OP in August, 2007 and December, 2007 -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, Section 76, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay in filing Election Petition - Election petition to be filed within 45 days to challenge election of a returned candidate - This period cannot be extended with aid of S.5 of the Limitation Act - Election petition is to be treated as a suit - There is no provision for..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Incident took place on 2.1.2005 and complaint filed on 1.1.2009 - No application for condonation of delay filed - The letter dated 19.12.2008 from the Alternate Dispute Redressal Cell does not and cannot extend the period of limitation - Complaint liable to be dismissed on the point..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay in filing application for restoration of appeal dismissed in default - Counsel for applicant inadvertently could not mark the case in the cause list and thus could not appear when the appeal listed for hearing which was dismissed in default - Held, these kind of errors/slips..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Applicant poor rustic villager - Unaware of the procedure for filing appeal - Strong factor to be taken into consideration while deciding application for condonation of delay...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay in filing appeal - Condonation - Fact that a case is good on merits constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay - Meritorious matter not to be dismissed at threshold - Delay of 447 days in filing appeal condoned as the same was good on merits...........

Showing : 431-440 of 894 Results