LawMirror.com

Results of condonation of delay s about application

Showing : 451-460 of 467 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1986
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 20, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4 - - Not a case of abatement under Order 22 Rule 4 - Covered by Order 41 Rule 20 - Proper course - To make application under Order 41 Rule 20 and claim condonation of delay...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 3A -- Appeal filed before certified copies made available - Appellant entitled to deduct days for obtaining certified copies and thus can file appeal within 30 days after deducting those days - Appeal filed with uncertified copies on 1st September against suit decreed on 25th July, application for certified copies made on 1st..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 2(2), Order 41, Rule 3A, Rule 9 - - Order dismissing appeal after dismissal of application under Section 5 Limitation Act - Not a decree within meaning of Section 2(2) of Code - Not open to Court to extend meaning of word "decree" and include in it other kind of orders though they are similar to orders expressly included in the..........

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB

Year of decision: 1984
Details

Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, Section 82(1)(b) -- Review beyond limitation - Cannot be converted into suo motu review - Review application filed long after expiry of 90 days period allowed by Section 82(1)(b)- No application, whether written or oral, for condonation of delay - Plea that it may be treated as a case of suo motu review - Not tenable - If application for review..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT FULL BENCH

Year of decision: 1983
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18 -- Filing of a written application within specific and prescribed period of time - Mandatory - To claim remedy under Section 18 - Statutory procedural requirements should be strictly fulfilled - In their absence no right flows therefrom - Court's direction to file a fresh application under Section 18 (irrespective of fact whether..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1976
Details

East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949 -- Rule 18 - Time-barred petition under Section 42 - Condonation of delay - Path for every Kurrah - Valid reason for acceptance of application on merits - Cannot be treated as valid ground for condoning delay under Rule 18 - East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation)..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1974
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148 -- Enlargement of time when cannot be granted - When the petitioner did not file certified copies of judgment and decree and rendered no explanation for his inaction and also made no application for extension of time before the expiry of the time allowed by court, held that section 148 cannot be invoked by the petitioner for..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 0000
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 3-A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Provision of O.41.R.3-A is not mandatory - Application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal at a later stage is permissible...........

H.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 0000
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Delay of 6 months in filing appeal - Ground for condonation of delay that the Counsel did not inform him about the decision of the case and he came to know about the decision of the case when he received notice in execution petition - Copy of that..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 0000
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Delay of 120 days in filing revision - No dates have been mentioned by the petitioner while explaining and justifying the delay - The period of delay which is sought to be condoned does not seem to be known to the petitioner since no mention about it in the application - The..........

Showing : 451-460 of 467 Results