Showing : 481-490 of 894 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9-- Abatement - Setting aside - Principles governing - (i) The words 'sufficient cause for not making the application within the period of limitation' should be understood and applied in a reasonable, pragmatic, practical and liberal manner, depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case, and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34-- Arbitration award - Setting aside - Delay - Condonation - Party prosecuting remedy before wrong forum on a wrong advice of counsel - S.5 of Limitation Act is not applicable - However, S.14 of Limitation Act is applicable to proceedings under Arbitration Act - Delay condoned u/s 14 of Limitation..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Cause of action to the complainant accrued on June 7,1994 and complaint filed on 5.5.1997 - Neither application for condonation of delay nor any sufficient cause shown - The question of condonation of delay in filing the complaint does not arise - Complaint barred by time and ought to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 , 21(b)-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Revision against the order dismissing appeal as time barred by the State Commission - Delay of 1270 days - Ground that the same caused by their Advocate who was non cooperative - Petitioner did not file complaint against the Advocate to Bar Council nor any consumer..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Land of member of co-owner acquired - Court fixed compensation u/s 18 of Land Acquisition Act - Some of the owners filed appeal - Petitioners did not file appeal as he was advised that benefit of judgment rendered in appeals filed by other owners would be available to him -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 3, 5, Article 123-- Application filed beyond period of limitation without being accompanied by an application for condonation of delay - Held, in absence of an application for condonation of delay, Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application for setting aside the decree...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - An application for condonation of delay has to be decided first before considering the objections...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 14(2)-- Condonation of delay - Both the provisions of Ss.5 & 14 of the Act are meant for grant of relief where a person has committed some mistake - Both the provisions alike should be applied in a broad-based manner - When S.14(2) per se is not applicable then principles akin thereto can be applied -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 14(2)-- Condonation of delay - Beneficial provisions of Ss.5 and 14 of the Act not to be applied in a pedantic manner...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 17-- Non payment of amount - Resumption of plot - Condonation of delay - Instructions of HUDA providing for condonation of delay of 150 days by Chief Administrator and beyond that by its Chairman - Representation for condonation of delay rejected by Estate Officer - Held, order is without jurisdiction..........

Showing : 481-490 of 894 Results