Showing : 491-500 of 894 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 386-- Leave to appeal by State Govt. - Enhancement of sentence - Delay of about 7 years and 9 months - Only explanation for delay given by counsel for State is that public prosecutor appearing on behalf of State in trial court did not inform State Govt. about result of the case - Further record of trial..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 117 days - Ground that the Counsel engaged by the petitioner an old man was unavailable for nearly 90 days on account of some personal difficulty - Held this is hardly acceptable - Not persuaded to condone the delay on the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Sufficient cause - S.5 does not lay down any standard or objective test - The test of 'sufficient cause' is purely an individualistic test - It is not an objective test - No two cases can be treated alike - Sufficient cause is not defined in Limitation Act - Court to decide..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 2, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 167-- Petitioner suffered serious injuries in road accident - Claim petition filed by petitioner, dismissed in default by Tribunal on account of non-filing of process free - Restoration application filed belatedly without filing application for condonation of delay - Held, petitioner cannot be made to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - While deciding an application for condonation of delay Court ought not to go into merits of the case - At that stage Court has to see whether there is sufficient cause to condone the delay...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 64 days on account of administrative delay in movement of file of revision - Though not sufficient ground for condoning the delay, yet in the facts and circumstances and especially since the impugned orders suffer from serious..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Application for - Stagewise day to day delay in pursuing the matter at different levels for filing revision not explained - No sufficient justification given by the petitioner so as to condone the delay in filing the revision - Application rejected..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Even before the State Commission the petitioner was not diligent in prosecuting the matter and approached the State Commission with delay and revision was dismissed - Though there was no sufficient ground to condone the delay yet the same condoned..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 141 days in filing appeal - Ground that appellant being a Government Department the file seeking approval to file appeal had to pass through various departments - Explanation furnished from the side of the appellant is not a..........
ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Cause of action had arisen to respondent - complainant on 13.1.1994 when a sum of Rs. 300/ - was disbursed to him by appellant - OP - Complaint filed on 19.7.1997 - It was filed more than three years after the cause of action arose - No application for condonation of..........

Showing : 491-500 of 894 Results