Showing : 391-400 of 616 Results

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Plot allotment - Non payment of instalments - Interest - Possession of plot offered to the complainant on 11.12.1995 - Complaint filed on 20.10.1999 - Neither any explanation for delay given nor application for condonation of delay filed - Complaint barred by limitation and liable to..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Continuing cause of action - Complainant came to know on 28.8.2001 that property purchased by him from OP was under equitable mortgage with the SBI - He made complaint to the Police in 2002 and case registered against OP - Present complaint filed before District Forum on 25.8.2005..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Condonation of delay - Banking service - Fraudulently transfer of funds from complainant's account to a stranger' account - Since October, 1997 the matter was taken up with Bank which was forwarded to higher officers of the Bank and rejected in July, 2001 - Criminal complaint lodged..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Limitation - 'No instructions' - Party cannot be penalised for fault of counsel - Limitation to file application to set aside exparte decree starts from the date of knowledge - Application for condonation of delay allowed - Exparte decree set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Carelessness or negligence in prosecuting the lis is not lack of sufficient cause to seek condonation of delay...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Delay of 5 months and 10 days in filing appeal - Sufficient cause not shown for condonation of delay - In the meanwhile, a right had accrued to the complainant which cannot be disturbed if the aggrieved party does not exercise his right in time...........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Industrial plot - Delay in construction - Allegedly due to not providing of amenities by OPs - Plot allotted on 5.8.1974 - Till 17.1.1982 no grievance made by the complainant that there is no facilities like sewerage, water, road etc. - The allegation found to be unsubstantiated -..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Ground that delay caused on account of time spent in getting the Hindi documents translated into English and in getting the copy of Judgment of State Commission from Bhilwara - Held that if the party is negligent or careless in getting the copy, it..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 3-A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay in filing of appeal - Condonation of delay - Procedure - Mandatory for Appellate Court to decide the application for condonation of delay before it proceeds to decide the appeal on merits - Without deciding the application for condonation of delay, the Appellate Court has no jurisdiction to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 3-A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal barred by time - Application for condonation of delay - Appellate Court allowed appeal without deciding the application for condonation of delay - Judgment of Appellate Court is wholly without jurisdiction - Incumbent upon the Court to decide application under section 5 before proceeding to..........

Showing : 391-400 of 616 Results