Showing : 421-430 of 894 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Onus to show that sufficient cause exists for condonation of delay lis upon the applicant...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 19-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 205 days in filing the appeal - The reasons for delay stated in the application and additional affidavit found not sufficient - There is no reason to condone the undue delay - Appeal dismissed on the ground of uncondonable delay...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - There is no straight jacket formula to come to the conclusion of sufficient and good grounds - Each case has to be weighed from its facts and the circumstances in which the party acts and behaves...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Unless malafides are writ large on the conduct of the party, generally as a normal rule, delay should be condoned - In the legal arena, an attempt should always be made to allow the matter to be contested on merits rather than to throw it on such technalities...........
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Medical negligence - Complainant taken treatment with the OPs between 20.3.2000 and 23.3.2000 - Complaint filed on 23.3.2003 alleged medical negligence - Not a case of continuous cause of action or to claim compensation a new cause of action had arisen against the OP - No petition..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Cause of action to the complainant arose on 6.10.2003 - Complaint filed after more than two years and two months held not maintainable in view of the provisions of Section 24A of the Act - No application for condonation of delay filed before the District Forum - The District Forum..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 188 days in filing appeal after the passing of the impugned order - Delay not properly explained - The application for condonation of delay dismissed...........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 24A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal condonation of delay - Delay of 281 days in filing the appeal - Only reason given that due to some unavoidable reasons the appeal was filed with delay - Not a sufficient cause when the Counsel for the appellants was present before the District Forum when the impugned order was passed -..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Industrial plot - Deficiency in service - Plot allotment - Possession given on 19.4.1996 - Complaint filed in the year 2000 - Application for condonation of delay filed on the ground that the infrastructure facilities were not provided by the OP and no action taken for removal of HT..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 83 days in filing appeal before the State Commission - The only cause shown was that the file was moving from table to table - Rightly held to be not sufficient cause...........

Showing : 421-430 of 894 Results