Showing : 61-70 of 816 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex Parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause is shown by defendant for her absence before Court below, as her husband was ill and has subsequently died - Application allowed subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Defendant failed to appear on account of illness and subsequent death of her husband - Sufficient cause shown by defendant for her no, appearance before trial Court - Delay condoned - Ex parte decree set aside...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 125, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal to Supreme Court - Delay of 71 days in filing appeal - Condonation of delay - Limitation for filing such appeal is 60 days - However, Supreme Court has jurisdiction to condone delay for a further period of not exceeding 60 days - Delay beyond such 60 days is uncondonable and it cannot be..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Delay - Condonation of delay - Delay in filing appeal due to incorrect legal advice - It cannot be considered that applicant deliberately and mala fidely filed the appeal belatedly - Court must be extremely liberal in the matters of condonation of delay and if a person has acted in bona..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 3(5)-- Summary suit - Leave to defend - Rejected on the ground of no, submission of application for condonation of delay - Due to lack of suitable advice to be given to party by his advocate, delay condonation application not filed - Party therefore, should not be made to suffer for something which was..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 75 days in filing application for restoration of suit - Delay of 75 days in filing application for restoration of suit is not an inordinate delay and ought to have been condoned by the trial Court...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit - Long time consumed by plaintiff in producing his evidence - Not a ground for dismissal of application for condonation of delay and restoration of suit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 362-- Review - Delay of 358 days in filing review petition - Condonation of delay - No satisfactory explanation for condonation of such huge delay - Though petitions are liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet after going into petitions of review, there is no error apparent on the face..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay in filing review petition - Delay occurred due to prosecution of special leave petition before Supreme Court in the earlier round of litigation - Delay condoned...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 243 days in filing appeal by State - No explanation worth the name is offered to condone the delay - Court cannot treat the State differently than a common litigant and even if some leverage is given to State for procedural delays, it would be absurd to stretch the..........

Showing : 61-70 of 816 Results