Showing : 1-10 of 816 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - In case delay is not that inordinate and other party can be monetarily compensated, then Court rather than following a hyper technical approach has to follow a approach which is more humane and justice oriented...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after about seven months - Such delay cannot be said to be inordinate delay - In case delay is not that inordinate and other party can be monetarily compensated, then Court rather than following a..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96(2), Order 9, Rule 13-- Dismissal of application to set aside exparte decree - Condonation of delay in filing appeal against exparte decree - Time spent in pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC is to be taken as `sufficient cause' for condoning delay in filing first appeal...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 122-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Statutory period for filing restoration application is the date of order and not knowledge of order - Condonation of delay is not permissible in absence of an application - No permission can be granted to an aggrieved party for filing an application for..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13-- Appeal against ex parte decree - Exclusion of time spent in pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Provision of S.14 of the Act is not applicable in excluding time spent in proceeding U.O.9.R.13 CPC - However, principles analogous to S.14 of the Act would be applicable for purpose of condonation of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Arbitration award - Objections - Condonation of delay - S.5 of Limitation Act is not applicable to an application u/s 34 Arbitration Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34-- Arbitration award - Objections - Condonation of delay - Administrative difficulties not a valid reason to condone delay above and beyond the statutory prescribed period u/s 34 of Arbitration Act...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Delay of 45 days in filing complaint - Condonation of delay - Delay is not inordinate - Reasonable explanation for delay in filing complaint rendered by complainant - Nothing pointed out to show that there was negligence on part of complainant or that delay lacks bona fide -..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 9-- Leave to appeal - Delay in filing - Condonation of delay - Question arose as to whether appeal to be numbered on date of filing or to date of condonation - Held, a valid appeal is registered on its filing for all practical purposes even if appeal and C.M.C.(P) are accompanied by a petition to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Application filed with incorrect facts - Appellants negligent in pursuing the matter - Condonation of delay rightly refused...........

Showing : 1-10 of 816 Results