Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay of 350 days in filing application to set aside ex parte decree - Condonation - Plea of non informing of passing of decree by counsel - If at all counsel has not informed about passing of ex parte decree, petitioner could have got information through..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 19, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of appeal dismissed in default - Condonation of delay in filing application U.O.41.R.19 CPC - Restoration application though required to be filed within 30 days from date of dismissal of appeal, but same was filed with a delay of about 22 months - No cause much less sufficient..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Defendant was duly served as he himself signed copy of summon - Period of limitation therefore, would commence from date of decree and not from date of knowledge - Application U.O.9.R.13 CPC was filed beyond the period of limitation and no application for condonation of delay of 6 years was..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Delay of 547 days in filing petition to set aside ex parte decree - False ground set up to condone delay of 547 days in filing petition to set aside ex parte decree - There is no sufficient cause to condone delay as sought for -..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay - Condonation - Delay of 28 days - Ground of ill-health - Dismissal of application U.O.9.R.9 CPC bars institution of fresh suit - However, if application itself contains sufficiency of reasons for condonation of delay then there is no necessity..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of law - Delay of 916 days in filing LPA - There was delay and laches in filing writ petition itself at first instance from which present appeal had arisen - Even though writ petition was filed after obtaining approval of Executive Council, no steps were taken to file writ appeal for 916 days after disposal of writ petition -..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay - Condonation - Delay of 26 days - Ground of ill health - No documentary evidence in support thereof - Delay is not abnormal - Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- - Suit restored...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of more than 534 days in filing appeal against decree passed in Counter claim - Respondent has not approached Court with clean hands as he suppressed material facts, that too, deliberately and intentionally and thereby tried to gain an unfair advantage from the Court, that too, by casting serious allegations..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 222 days in filing the appeal - Plea of appellant that due to poverty she could not arrange for fee to engage counsel - Ex facie explanation sought to be tendered lacks bonfides as applicant being fully conscious of her rights and/or for redressal of her grievance had engaged a counsel and filed present..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 9, 10A -- Death of one of defendants - Substitution of LRs - Application filed by plaintiff on basis of her personal knowledge - There is no mention in application as to when plaintiff came to know about death of deceased defendant, from what source and why previously said fact was not in her knowledge - Plaintiff gained..........
