Showing : 71-80 of 112 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Applicability of Sec. 5 of Limitation Act to execution proceedings - Suit for recovery decreed - Execution - Property of judgment debtor attached and auctioned - No objections filed by judgment debtor - Sale confirmed and sale certificate issued - Application for delivery of possession - Objection..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 2-1/2 months in filing appeal - Lower Appellate Court dismissed the Application for condonation of delay along with appeal as barred by limitation - Plaintiff nothing to gain by causing the delay - Negligence of plaintiff in itself not sufficient to dislodge his case - While considering..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- - Ejectment petition - Respondent despite service did not appear - Ex-parte order of eviction passed - Appeal filed beyond limitation - No application for condonation of delay or any affidavit explaining long and inordinate delay filed - Dismissed by Commissioner on account of delay and latches -..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Condonation of delay - Ground, misplacing of impugned order of the District Forum which was duly received by the appellant - Held that in case he was unable to locate the order, another copy could be applied from the District Forum - Ground not valid and genuine for condoning the delay - Appeal..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Conviction u/s 294 & 332 IPC - Appeal against - Dismissed as time barred - Record not showing that scrutiny was carried out & counsel for appellant was informed about delay at the time of filing of appeal - It would be appropriate that applicant is allowed to move application for condonation of..........
JAMMU and KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution on 18.9.2002 - Application for restoration alongwith application for condonation of delay filed on 14.1.2003 - Reasons advanced and explanation given for occurrence of delay not indicative of due care and caution on the part of LIC - By..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Delay of 155 days - Ground that petitioner suffering from jaundice and advised rest by doctor - Particulars as to the date of consultation and name of doctor adivising rest not mentioned - Application dismissed as having not disclosing sufficient..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 126 days in filing appeal - Appellants averment that its counsel did not file appeal despite repeated visits by its local representative - In case the local representative came to know the inaction on the part of the counsel then he could take up the matter..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 157 days in filing the appeal - Plea taken that delay occurred due to illness of Senior Vice President (Legal) of the Appellant-Company - Illness of one person in a Public Company cannot be sufficient cause for condoning the delay - Appeal dismissed as..........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 15 days in filing the appeal - Appellant's version that he was engaged in the preparation for the exhibition - Certified copy received by a member of appellant's family on 16.10.1998 - Exhibition was to be commenced on 14.11.1998 - Sufficient time for..........

Showing : 71-80 of 112 Results