Showing : 71-80 of 123 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Ad Interim stay - Revision - Condonation of delay - Petition filed with delay of 155 days - Neither application for condonation of delay nor any affidavit in that respect filed - Revision petition filed belatedly liable to be dismissed - Would not like to interfere with the discretion exercised by..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Continuing cause of action - Complainant came to know on 28.8.2001 that property purchased by him from OP was under equitable mortgage with the SBI - He made complaint to the Police in 2002 and case registered against OP - Present complaint filed before District Forum on 25.8.2005..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(a)(ii)-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appellant being an illiterate widow was ill - advised to file Review Petition before the State Commission which was dismissed - The delay in filing the appeal required to be condoned...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Restoration of suit dismissed for default - Delay - Application for condonation of delay rejected on ground that there is inconsistency in evidence and that no documentary evidence was produced to substantiate the statement - Suit was at the stage of cross-examination of plaintiff - Held,..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of four months - No sufficient cause for condoning delay shown hence appeal dismissed - Held that if such a gross delay is condoned the whole purpose of the CP Act, 1986 of deciding the matter within the reasonable time would be frustrated...........
**************THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - It is not stated in the application as to why there is delay of 52 days in filing appeal - Delay not explained with reasonable certainty - Appeal held time barred and liable to be dismissed in limine...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 8 months in filing the appeal - Application u/s 5 for condonation of delay dismissed - No evidence that delay in filing of appeal was part of dilatory strategy or lacks bona-fide - Order of dismissal set aside - Appellate Court directed to admit the appeal and decide on merits...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- State appeal - Delay of 2 years in filing appeal - Application for condonation of delay on account of procedural arrangements - Dismissed by first Appellate Court - Revision - Relying on AIR 1996 SC 1623 it is contended that appeal good on merits and therefore Court was bound to decide appeal on..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Applicability of Sec. 5 of Limitation Act to execution proceedings - Suit for recovery decreed - Execution - Property of judgment debtor attached and auctioned - No objections filed by judgment debtor - Sale confirmed and sale certificate issued - Application for delivery of possession - Objection..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 2-1/2 months in filing appeal - Lower Appellate Court dismissed the Application for condonation of delay along with appeal as barred by limitation - Plaintiff nothing to gain by causing the delay - Negligence of plaintiff in itself not sufficient to dislodge his case - While considering..........

Showing : 71-80 of 123 Results