Showing : 11-20 of 165 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13-- Appeal against ex parte decree - Exclusion of time spent in pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Provision of S.14 of the Act is not applicable in excluding time spent in proceeding U.O.9.R.13 CPC - However, principles analogous to S.14 of the Act would be applicable for purpose of condonation of..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 9-- Leave to appeal - Delay in filing - Condonation of delay - Question arose as to whether appeal to be numbered on date of filing or to date of condonation - Held, a valid appeal is registered on its filing for all practical purposes even if appeal and C.M.C.(P) are accompanied by a petition to..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after delay of 18 months - Appellant was aware about dismissal of suit still he knowingly failed to file application for restoration within prescribed period - Application rightly rejected...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Delay of about 3 years 8 months - Defendant corporation is public sector undertaking and huge public money is involved in the case - Ex parte decree set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs.50,000/-...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay of 513 days - Plea of illness and non intimation of dismissal by counsel - Said plea not substantiated by plaintiff - Even delay of 513 days in approaching Court not explained by plaintiff - Application for restoration of suit rightly..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Order 41, Rule 19-- Second appeal - Maintainability - First appeal dismissed in default - Prayer for re-admission of appeal along with application for condonation of delay, rejected as the same was barred by limitation - If application seeking condonation of delay is rejected, then such decision cannot be appealable..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1-- Non filing of written statement within stipulated time - Condonation of delay - Provision of O.8.R.1 CPC though, procedural in nature and hand maid of justice - However, that does not mean that defendant has right to take as much time as he wants in filing written statement, without giving..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article 123-- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Limitation would reckon from date when ex-parte decree is passed by Court and not from date of knowledge of ex-parte decree - If the delay is explained to the extent that applicant was unaware of happenings in suit, Court should consider the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 1825 days in filing appeal against ex parte decree - Defendant already exhausted remedy U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Appeal against ex parte decree filed after 5 years from dismissal of application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Defendant can file an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC and a regular..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9-- Abatement - Condonation of delay - In construing `sufficient cause' vis-a-vis an application U.O.22.R.9 CPC, strict and pedantic approach not desirable and Courts are expected to make sincere endeavour to allow condonation of delay in the interest of justice and fair play...........

Showing : 11-20 of 165 Results