Showing : 61-70 of 138 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, 151, Order 34, Rule 7(2), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 30(a)-- Redemption of usufrcutary mortgage - Delay in depositing interest on decretal amount - Condonation of delay - Plaintiff completely failed to make out any ground - Deposit could be made upto the period when limitation to file suit would have expired - Order allowing condonation of delay set aside...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Substitution of LRs - Condonation of delay - Delay has not at all been explained in the entire affidavit - No reason whatsoever has been assigned at all - Held, condonation of delay application rejected...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 22, Rule 3,9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Abatement - Setting aside of - Condonation of delay - Applicant didn't know about pendency of appeal before first Appellate Court - Applicant No.1 is a house wife, who has studied only upto 8th standard and applicants No.2 & 3 were minor at the relevant time - In heading of application relevant..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay of three years - Condonation of delay - Mistake of clerk of counsel as he could not mark the case and counsel could not appear and case was dismissed for want of prosecution - Factum of dismissal came into notice of applicant on inspection of file..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 41, Rule 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Appeal - Powers of Court - Held, nothing forbids a look into the merits in terms of O.41.R.11 CPC even while considering an application u/s 5 of Limitation Act in connection with a first appeal u/s 96 CPC...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Bringing legal heirs on record - Condonation of delay - Averments contained in application ex-facie lack bona fide - Petitioners have failed to explain delay by showing sufficient cause - Held, it is true that approach of Courts should be liberal so far as applications filed u/s 5 of Limitation..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of second appeal - Condonation of delay - Second appeal transferred to another Court got dismissed for default - Applicants in delay condonation application have categorically stated that no notice of transfer were sent to them - Held, there is just reason for no, appearance in Court..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, 9-- Death of appellant during pendency of appeal - Substitution application not filed - Appeal dismissed - Restoration application alognwith application for condonation of delay filed after four and half years - Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case delay condoned and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 22, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Cross objections - Not filed within time - Condonation of delay - Court normally be inclined to condone the delay in the interest of justice unless and until the cross objector is unable to furnish a reasonable or sufficient cause for seeking leave of Court to file cross objections beyond..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Condonation - Delay of 8 years condoned but application for setting aside ex parte decree dismissed - Held, it would be in the interest of justice to allow appeal filed by he appellant and allow the application U.9.R.13 CPC, of course, with a heavy costs..........

Showing : 61-70 of 138 Results