Showing : 81-90 of 91 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Delay - Condonation - Petition dismissed for default - Affidavit averment of the tenant about the collusion between his then counsel and the landlord without any proof of the same - Not a ground to condone the inordinate delay of 2037 days in filing the petition...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Maintainability of application during pendency of appeal - Explanation to Order 9.R.13 does not bar filing of application for setting aside the decree appealed - Bar is attracted only when appeal is disposed of on any ground other than withdrawal by the appellant -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Application U.O.9.R.13 - Condonation of delay - Lack of actual knowledge - Constitute the sufficient case for condoning the delay - Revisional Court should not disturb the findings of the Courts below more so where the substantial justice has been done...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Exparte decree - Application for setting aside exparte decree and condonation of delay - Both the applications can be decided together...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Suit dismissed for default - Restoration - Condonation of delay - Both Bank and its Advocate must share blame for delay - Bank must make proper arrangement to pursue its litigations - Delay condoned and suit restored subject to condition that Bank has no claim for interest for period from date of..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Where Court had served notice, not on party but on his Advocate who was not appearing for party, party had no notice of proceedings and in such situation delay has to be condoned to prevent miscarriage of justice...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(d), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Order dismissing application to condone delay in filing application to set aside exparte decree - Only appeal lies...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Delay can be condoned even without filing separate application for condonation of delay, if delay is otherwise explained in the affidavit filed in support of application made to set aside the exparte decree...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Petitioner a rustic villager and an illiterate person residing in a remote village - Reasons for absence stated that his Advocate told him to come to Court only on receipt of a letter from him to give evidence and that no letter was received by him - Sufficient..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Condonation - Application rejected taking note of vigour with which the petitioner was participating in various proceedings in various Courts - Order justified in revision...........

Showing : 81-90 of 91 Results