LawMirror.com

Results of consumer protection act

Showing : 331-340 of 3028 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o) -- Post Retirement Complementary Passes - Refusal to grant benefit of travelling double journey en - route over the portion Trichirapalli, Thanjuvar - Trichirapalli on the plea that that since Tanjavur is not a terminal station because the route from Tanjavur is further extended towards Tambaram, Villupuram and Nagore..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Money Back Policy with accident benefit - Repudiation - The complainant was dealing with explosives at the time of accident - Withdrawal of the criminal proceedings against the complainant amongst others ipso facto does not establish his case that he was not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Compensation - Quantum of compensation - Airlines - Refusal to allow the petitioner to board the flight on the ground that there was no booking though the petitioner has ticket with OK status - The order of the District Forum was modified by the State Commission and compensation reduced from 25,000/..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Money Back Policy with accident benefit - Repudiation - The complainant was dealing with explosives at the time of accident - Withdrawal of the criminal proceedings against the complainant amongst others ipso facto does not establish his case that he was not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Compensation - Quantum of compensation - Airlines - Refusal to allow the petitioner to board the flight on the ground that there was no booking though the petitioner has ticket with OK status - The order of the District Forum was modified by the State Commission and compensation reduced from 25,000/..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Insurance claim - Policy in question was issued by OP - 1/respondent No. 1 from New Delhi - The husband of the complainant No. 1 was working in a firm in Mohali and died at Amritsar - Finding by the District Forum that no cause of action arose at Chandigarh and it has no jurisdiction to entertain..........

UNION TERRITORY STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Insurance claim - Policy in question was issued by OP - 1/respondent No. 1 from New Delhi - The husband of the complainant No. 1 was working in a firm in Mohali and died at Amritsar - Finding by the District Forum that no cause of action arose at Chandigarh and it has no jurisdiction to entertain..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Ground for condonation of 82 days delay that due to lengthy departmental process delay occurred - Plea taken on behalf of the appellant - OP not acceptable - No special concession can be given to the Government Department to condone the delay, when no 'sufficient..........

Showing : 331-340 of 3028 Results