LawMirror.com

Results of consumer protection

Showing : 1221-1230 of 3034 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d) -- Residential Flat Registration Scheme for Slum Dwellers - Registration of flat - Deposit refund - Interest - Money retained by petitioner for 25 years - Plea that as per terms of Rule 6.4 of the Rules for initial period of one year rate of interest could be payable @ 7% p.a. - Keeping in view the delay of 25 years..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Postal service - Necessary party - Speed post envelope - Non receipt of envelop even after 14 days - Appellants sent the envelopethrough Singapore Airlines - Plea that Singapore Airlines is necessary party repelled - Held that complainant - respondents had got no concern with Singapore Airlines as they have not hired any..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d), Post Office Act, 1898, Section 6 -- Compensation - Postal services - Speed Post Envelope - Containing Air tickets - Non delivery at destination even after 14 days - The complainant had to purchase fresh tickets after paying a sum of Rs. 24,348 - Section 6 of the Post Office Act does not operate to preclude claim of..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 22B -- Supervisory jurisdiction - National Consumer Redressal Commission - In addition to the appellate and revisional jurisdiction NCDRC is having supervisory jurisdiction under Section 24 - B over Consumer Fora - Unless there is a contrary judgment by the Apex Court, the State Commission is bound to follow the decision rendered by..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 27 -- Non bailable warrant - Issuance of against petitioner - Abuse of power by the District Forum - The President of the State Commission directed to hold necessary inquiry...........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14(1)(d) -Plot allotment - Alternative plot - Compensation - Alternative plot ordered to be allotted on 15.1.2008 to the respondent on the old prices prevalent to the old allotte on 24.9.2001 - The compensation of Rs. 2000/- as well as cost of Rs. 2000/- awarded by the District Forum set aside...........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Appeal - New plea - Necessary party - Plea not taken before the District Forum - Even the plea not taken in the memo of appeal filed before the Commission - Plea about necessary party liable to be rejected...........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Truck - Purchased by complainant a commercial vehicle - Claiming warranty of 18 months - Complainant has not led any evidence to show that within 18 months of warranty period how much kilometers were covered by the vehicle in question - The evidence of the appellant - complainant lacking -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Interest Act, 1978, Section 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 34 -- Housing - Plot allotment - Interest rate - Charging on additional amount - Nothing in agreement which provides for rate of interest to be levied on the additional price on account of enhancement of acquisition cost - It has to be in keeping with..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3 -- Additional remedy - Petitioner exercised his right of appeal against order of resumption passed by the Estate Officer - The order passed by Administrator on appeal cannot be challenged under Section 3 of the CP Act - Petitioner complainant would be free to approach the higher authority whosoever it is to seek relief against the..........

Showing : 1221-1230 of 3034 Results