Showing : 21-30 of 542 Results

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Medical negligence - Hair transplant surgery - Not in dispute that the procedure as promised could not be completed in one mega sitting because a part of it had to be temporarily postponed to the next day - It was the Respondent who chose not to continue with the procedure - It cannot be concluded..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(1)(o)-- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund - Consumer - Consumer dispute - Plea that the case do not fall within the ambit of the CP Act, 1986 - Complaints were made on specific grounds of deficiency in service before the District Forum - As per Section 2(d)(ii) of the..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(1)(o)-- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund- Held that the coaching institutions may not be conventional educational institutions but since they provide coaching and training to students of an educational nature to equip them for higher studies in specialized educational..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 27-- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund - Appeal - Frivolous litigation - Punitive damages - Adverse comments - Sweeping adverse comments made against all coaching institutes by the State Commission without any credible evidence to back these allegations and imposing..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - The insured vehicle of the petitioner was buried under snow for several months - Because of the washing away of the road and inclement weather where the tanker was stranded, it took several months before the Surveyor could get the vehicle inspected - This..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medical advice - Rendering wrong professional advice - OPs advised surgery for acute appendicitis whereas on consultation of another doctor it was found there was small cyst in the left ovary - Both Fora below have returned their concurrent finding..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medical advice - Rendering wrong professional advice - OPs advised surgery for acute appendicitis whereas on consultation of another doctor it was found there was small cyst in the left ovary - Both Fora below have returned their concurrent finding..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Tractor - Purchase of - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Three items for which payment made by the respondent - complainant allegedly not supplied - Since items provided have been clearly listed out and in acknowledgement the Rerspondent's signature are also there - Unable to accept..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Tractor - Purchase of - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Three items for which payment made by the respondent - complainant allegedly not supplied - Since items provided have been clearly listed out and in acknowledgement the Rerspondent's signature are also there - Unable to accept..........
THE UNION TERRITORY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 15-- Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Motor vehicle - Selling of vehicle used for demonstration as brand new vehicle - Findings of the District Forum that it tantamount to deficiency in service and indulgence into unfair trade practice upheld and appeal liable to be..........

Showing : 21-30 of 542 Results