Showing : 81-90 of 548 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- UTI Mastergain 1992 - Transfer of unit - Delay to 3 to 15 months - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Total value of units being around Rs. 49,00,000/ - - It will adequately meet the ends of justice if a lump sum compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/ - is awarded to the complainant to be paid by OP..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- UTI Mastergain 1992 - Transfer of unit - Delay to 3 to 15 months - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Total value of units being around Rs. 49,00,000/ - - It will adequately meet the ends of justice if a lump sum compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/ - is awarded to the complainant to be paid by OP..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(m)(iii), 2(e) &, 3-- Respondent member of cooperative society registered under provisions of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Respondent entered into transaction with petitioner society by joining in a particular scheme - Respondent filed complaint before Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum alleging deficiency..........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- Additional remedy - Transportation service - Deficiency in service - Criminal case - Held that in case the matter involves deficiency in service a complaint may be filed before the Consumer Fora and pendency of criminal case would be not bar...........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Transportation service - Non delivery of consignment - Deficiency in service - Order of the District Forum allowing the complaint and directing to pay the price of the consignment with interest @ 6% upheld and Rs. 10,000/ - toward mental harassment upheld...........
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Banking service - Over draft Account - Against the shares - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Account closed but lien on shares not cancelled - Appellant could not sell his shares - Held to be a case of deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice - Respondent No. 1/OP No. 1..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Port Trust - Transit shed - Allotment of - Demurrage charges - Deficiency is service - While the rice weighing 2738.170 MTs contained in bags was lying in TS - 3, it was allegedly badly infested and also damaged as a result of leakage of rain water into the said transit shed rendering it unfit for..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Port Trust - Transit shed - Allotment of - Demurrage charges - Deficiency is service - While the rice weighing 2738.170 MTs contained in bags was lying in TS - 3, it was allegedly badly infested and also damaged as a result of leakage of rain water into the said transit shed rendering it unfit for..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Consumer - Banking service - Compensation - Complaint by respondent an employee of appellant bank about non intimation to him about transfer of his bank account to another bank - Plea by the appellant that it was a dispute between the employer and employee and outside the scope of CP Act repelled..........

Showing : 81-90 of 548 Results