Showing : 81-90 of 543 Results

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Banking service - Over draft Account - Against the shares - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Account closed but lien on shares not cancelled - Appellant could not sell his shares - Held to be a case of deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice - Respondent No. 1/OP No. 1..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Port Trust - Transit shed - Allotment of - Demurrage charges - Deficiency is service - While the rice weighing 2738.170 MTs contained in bags was lying in TS - 3, it was allegedly badly infested and also damaged as a result of leakage of rain water into the said transit shed rendering it unfit for..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Port Trust - Transit shed - Allotment of - Demurrage charges - Deficiency is service - While the rice weighing 2738.170 MTs contained in bags was lying in TS - 3, it was allegedly badly infested and also damaged as a result of leakage of rain water into the said transit shed rendering it unfit for..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Summary Jurisdiction - Banking service - Fixed deposits - Fraud and forgery - Serious allegations relating to fraud, forgery and connivance of bank have been leveled on the part of the bank with regard to FDR's - In the present case proper course for the appellant is to approach the civil Court in..........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Consumer - Banking service - Compensation - Complaint by respondent an employee of appellant bank about non intimation to him about transfer of his bank account to another bank - Plea by the appellant that it was a dispute between the employer and employee and outside the scope of CP Act repelled..........
UTTARAKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Motor vehicle - Deficiency in service - Dealers liability - Appellant manufacturer not liable to replace the engine as the warranty period has expired due to negligence of the selling dealer - respondent No.2 - The original engine appears to have never been repaired/reconditioned by the dealer -..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o), 3-- Gratuity - Claim for - Consumer - Service - Deficiency in service - There is no relationship of consumer between the employer/appellant and the complainant/respondent and consequently there cannot be any deficiency of service by the employer for the purpose of payment of gratuity to the employee..........
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Digital Solvent printer - Appellants supplied printer of model No. 1800E instead of model No. 1830S as ordered by the respondent - Complainant time to time informed appellants about the delivery and installation of different make..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Allegation of manufacturing defect, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice against OP No. 1 and 2, i.e. dealer and Manufacturer - Neither any allegation against OP No. 3 who financed..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Expert report - As per expert report there occurred premature replacement and overhauling of the master cylinder of the vehicle and replacement of the entire gearbox during warranty period -..........

Showing : 81-90 of 543 Results