Showing : 161-170 of 227 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Scooter defect - No manufacturing defect - Defect pointed out rectified and the petitioner complainant gave satisfactory note - Complaint filed alleging various defects and deficiency in service dismissed by the District Forum and appeal also dismissed - Held that petitioner has given satisfactory..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Claim totalling about Rs. 1 crore - Contention of OP that it has already paid the complainant a sum of Rs. 4,35,246/- in complete satisfaction of its insurance claim - Arbitration clause also existed - Numerous documents are on record - It would be difficult to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 21-- Very detailed evidence required to prove the claim and to prove the damages and expenses - Not an appropriate case to be heard and disposed of in a summary fashion - Appellant given liberty to move civil court...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Complaint - Complex questions of law and fact - Insurance claim - Allegation of undue delay on the part of OP in not settling the claim - Along with the complaint there are as many as 125 documents - Evidence will have to be led and the provisions of SEBI Act and rules framed thereunder will have..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Complicated questions of law and facts - Insurance claim - Contamination of Acrlyonitrile due to leakage of some other article in other tanker in the vessel - As many as 125 documents filed to support the case - The case requires recording of voluminous evidence - It will take considerable time to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Revision - Limitation - Held that the Act does not provide for any limitation for revision - Revision should ordinarily be filed within a period of 90 days otherwise it is likely to be dismissed on the ground of latches...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21,(b)-- Plot - Earnest money - Refund - Interest - Held that even where there is no provision for payment of interest either expressly or impliedly, interest could be awarded on equitable considerations @ 12% p.a. - Order of the District Forum directing refund of the earnest money with interest @ 10% as..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b),14(1),(d)-- Medical negligence - Compensation - Revision - Concurrent findings of negligence against respondent doctor - It cannot be questioned in the revision petition U/s 21(b) of the Act filed by the petitioner/complainant - Award of compensation of Rs. 20,000 by the Fora's below held to be too inadequate..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b),15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appeal against the orders of District Forum awarding a compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- against petitioner for deficiency in service in maintaining swimming pool resulting in death of son of the respondent dismissed holding that there is no sufficient cause to condone..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Hospital - Negligence - Removal of uterus - Difference of opinion amongst the experts on the procedure adopted by a doctor - Procedure which is commonly in practice in an area if adopted by a doctor, it cannot be said that there is negligence on his part...........

Showing : 161-170 of 227 Results