Showing : 161-170 of 228 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Housing - Non delivery of possession of shop despite payment of price - Direction given by the District Forum to hand over the possession of the shop and for payment of interest @ 18% on the amount deposited till the date when possession is delivered - Interference by State Commission..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Scooter defect - No manufacturing defect - Defect pointed out rectified and the petitioner complainant gave satisfactory note - Complaint filed alleging various defects and deficiency in service dismissed by the District Forum and appeal also dismissed - Held that petitioner has given satisfactory..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Claim totalling about Rs. 1 crore - Contention of OP that it has already paid the complainant a sum of Rs. 4,35,246/- in complete satisfaction of its insurance claim - Arbitration clause also existed - Numerous documents are on record - It would be difficult to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 21-- Very detailed evidence required to prove the claim and to prove the damages and expenses - Not an appropriate case to be heard and disposed of in a summary fashion - Appellant given liberty to move civil court...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Complaint - Complex questions of law and fact - Insurance claim - Allegation of undue delay on the part of OP in not settling the claim - Along with the complaint there are as many as 125 documents - Evidence will have to be led and the provisions of SEBI Act and rules framed thereunder will have..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Complicated questions of law and facts - Insurance claim - Contamination of Acrlyonitrile due to leakage of some other article in other tanker in the vessel - As many as 125 documents filed to support the case - The case requires recording of voluminous evidence - It will take considerable time to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Revision - Limitation - Held that the Act does not provide for any limitation for revision - Revision should ordinarily be filed within a period of 90 days otherwise it is likely to be dismissed on the ground of latches...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21,(b)-- Plot - Earnest money - Refund - Interest - Held that even where there is no provision for payment of interest either expressly or impliedly, interest could be awarded on equitable considerations @ 12% p.a. - Order of the District Forum directing refund of the earnest money with interest @ 10% as..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b),14(1),(d)-- Medical negligence - Compensation - Revision - Concurrent findings of negligence against respondent doctor - It cannot be questioned in the revision petition U/s 21(b) of the Act filed by the petitioner/complainant - Award of compensation of Rs. 20,000 by the Fora's below held to be too inadequate..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b),15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appeal against the orders of District Forum awarding a compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- against petitioner for deficiency in service in maintaining swimming pool resulting in death of son of the respondent dismissed holding that there is no sufficient cause to condone..........

Showing : 161-170 of 228 Results