Showing : 121-130 of 228 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(1)(a)(ii)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 122 days in filing the revision petition - Explanation given for delay - Keeping in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court that to advance substantial justice, the acceptance of explanation should be the rule and refusal an exception, the more so..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Appreciation of evidence - Alleged contract with respondent for supplying and laying of granite slabs - Though receipt filed with complaint but author of the receipt who was then the Manager of the respondent not examined - State Commission for cogent reasons has found..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Ex parte order - Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 595 days in filing appeal - Delay certainly undue delay - Glaring facts brought to notice - Delay condoned - Miscarriage of justice occasioned in the case - Impugned order passed by the State Commission set aside - Complaint remitted to the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) , 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Consumer - PCO connection - Franchisee Agreement - A copy of the Franchisee Agreement' sought to be brought on record - This plea of the 'Franchisee' not having been taken before both the lower Fora especially when this was within the knowledge of the petitioner - Adverse..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Fresh evidence - Held that at the revisional stage, it would not be permissible for the petitioner to adduce fresh evidence necessitating a complete reappreciation of the whole matter...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 588 days in filing revision - Application does not disclose sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay - Application dismissed - Revision too dismissed as barred by limitation...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(a)(ii)-- Revision petition - Maintainability - Against the original order passed by the District Forum, no appeal filed by the petitioner/complainant before the State Commission - The State Commission's order does not modify the order passed by the District Forum - The complainant is estopped from filing..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Vehicle theft due to gross negligence in leaving the truck unattended by roadside at an isolated place with the ignition key on the dashboard - Varying statements of complainant and associated interested persons - Cast a reasonable doubt on their overall bona fides..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appeal by Govt. Deptt - No special provisions though there is lengthy process is alleged to be involved - There could be delay of few days or few weeks - Delay of over one year - Application does not sufficiently explain the delay caused - Valuable right has accrued..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Ad Interim stay - Revision - Condonation of delay - Petition filed with delay of 155 days - Neither application for condonation of delay nor any affidavit in that respect filed - Revision petition filed belatedly liable to be dismissed - Would not like to interfere with the discretion exercised by..........

Showing : 121-130 of 228 Results