Showing : 121-130 of 227 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Appreciation of evidence - Alleged contract with respondent for supplying and laying of granite slabs - Though receipt filed with complaint but author of the receipt who was then the Manager of the respondent not examined - State Commission for cogent reasons has found..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Ex parte order - Appeal - Condonation of delay - Delay of 595 days in filing appeal - Delay certainly undue delay - Glaring facts brought to notice - Delay condoned - Miscarriage of justice occasioned in the case - Impugned order passed by the State Commission set aside - Complaint remitted to the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) , 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Consumer - PCO connection - Franchisee Agreement - A copy of the Franchisee Agreement' sought to be brought on record - This plea of the 'Franchisee' not having been taken before both the lower Fora especially when this was within the knowledge of the petitioner - Adverse..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Fresh evidence - Held that at the revisional stage, it would not be permissible for the petitioner to adduce fresh evidence necessitating a complete reappreciation of the whole matter...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 588 days in filing revision - Application does not disclose sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay - Application dismissed - Revision too dismissed as barred by limitation...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(a)(ii)-- Revision petition - Maintainability - Against the original order passed by the District Forum, no appeal filed by the petitioner/complainant before the State Commission - The State Commission's order does not modify the order passed by the District Forum - The complainant is estopped from filing..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Vehicle theft due to gross negligence in leaving the truck unattended by roadside at an isolated place with the ignition key on the dashboard - Varying statements of complainant and associated interested persons - Cast a reasonable doubt on their overall bona fides..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Appeal by Govt. Deptt - No special provisions though there is lengthy process is alleged to be involved - There could be delay of few days or few weeks - Delay of over one year - Application does not sufficiently explain the delay caused - Valuable right has accrued..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Ad Interim stay - Revision - Condonation of delay - Petition filed with delay of 155 days - Neither application for condonation of delay nor any affidavit in that respect filed - Revision petition filed belatedly liable to be dismissed - Would not like to interfere with the discretion exercised by..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21-- Review - Notice issued only on the point of interest - At a distant point of time of 7 years appellant cannot orally seek a review of order...........

Showing : 121-130 of 227 Results